ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Experimental Tort Reform: States take different approaches to implement change

by Geri Aston • December 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Health courts are another idea with a lot of buzz. Under this concept, championed by the nonprofit legal reform coalition Common Good, medical injury cases would go to specialized courts featuring adjudicators with medical expertise, independent expert witnesses and predictable damage awards.

You Might Also Like

  • Physician Groups Set 2011 Agenda: Medicare payment reform tops the list
  • A Better Way to Implement EMRs: Why one-size-fits-all won’t work
  • Health Reform to Insure 32 Million: Are you ready for them?
  • Health Care as a Commodity: Competition should be focus of health reform, lecturer says
Explore This Issue
December 2010
Michelle M. Mello, JD, PhD “The changed state political landscape may not improve the chances for award caps.”—Michelle M. Mello, JD, PhD

Stipulations in the health reform law, however, could make a health court project an awkward fit for the program. The law states that the demonstration projects cannot limit patients’ existing legal rights or ability to file a claim in state court and that patients may opt out of a project at any time and file under the existing system. So, for example, a liability insurer “could decide to convene a health court-like panel, but ultimately patients can opt out of that at any time even if they go all the way through the process,” Dr. Mello said. “Obviously, that limitation in the health reform law significantly restricts the kinds of experiments that we could see under these demonstrations.”

The stipulations are a fundamental flaw in the law, Smarr said. “What good is it if [when plaintiffs] don’t like the way it’s going, [they] can leave?”

The Future of Caps

The PIAA, AMA and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) have vowed to continue to push for tort reforms like those passed in California and Texas, both of which cap noneconomic damage awards at $250,000. The Republican takeover of the U.S. House in the November 2010 elections improves the chances for passage of similar reforms in that chamber next year, experts interviewed for this article said. The Senate, which remains majority Democrat, is expected to block any such effort.

GOP gains at the state level mean tort reform with noneconomic damage caps could become a hot topic at the state level. At the gubernatorial level, several states flipped to the GOP, bringing the total number of Republican governors to at least 29. The party also gained control of one or both houses in 13 state legislatures. The changed state political landscape may not improve the chances for award caps, Dr. Mello said. Because of court setbacks in some states, politicians might not want to expend political capital on the issue, she explained. Earlier this year, the Georgia and Illinois Supreme courts struck down noneconomic damage caps.

The medical community must keep fighting at the federal and state levels for medical malpractice reforms like those in California and Texas, said Ronald B. Kuppersmith, MD, AAO-HNS immediate past president. “You have to keep trying because you never know,” he added.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: affordable care act, health reform, healthcare reform, liability, malpractice, Medicare, policy, politicsIssue: December 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Physician Groups Set 2011 Agenda: Medicare payment reform tops the list
  • A Better Way to Implement EMRs: Why one-size-fits-all won’t work
  • Health Reform to Insure 32 Million: Are you ready for them?
  • Health Care as a Commodity: Competition should be focus of health reform, lecturer says

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Otolaryngologists Have a Major Role to Play in Treating COVID-19 Long-Haulers
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Podcasts Becoming More Popular Method of Education for Otolaryngologists
    • How to Embrace Optimism in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Tips on How to Approach Conversations with Patients about the COVID-19 Vaccine
    • Steps You Should Take to Protect Your Voice and Hearing During Telemedicine Sessions
    • Routine Postoperative Adjunct Treatments Unnecessary for Idiopathic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Polls

Have you spoken with your patients about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.