• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone

November 17, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The stapes velocity transfer function (SVTF), defined as the stapes velocity divided by ear canal pressure, was calculated for all cases. In a comparison of the 3D- SVTF and its three orthogonal components for an intact and a PORP case, two features were evident: first, although the component SVTFs of the intact case have prominent localized resonances, the 3D-SVTF is smoother because those resonances occur at different frequencies.

You Might Also Like

  • Bone Cement Superiority in Ossicular Chain Reconstruction/ Revision Stapes Surgery Not Supported by Evidence
  • Bone Cement and Revision Stapedectomy
  • Is There a “Best” Stapedectomy Prosthesis?
  • Are Post-Operative Hearing Results Better with Titanium Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses?
Explore This Issue
November 2016

The authors say this also suggests that the stapes has several different vibration modes over the measured frequency range; second, the relationship between the component SVTFs differs greatly between the intact and PORP cases, which indicates that the PORP affects not only the stapes vibration magnitude but also the vibration mode.

No significant difference was found between the acoustic performance of the new A-ORP designs and a conventional titanium PORP or an I-PORP.

Citation: Gottlieb PK, Li X, Monfared A, Blevins N, Puria S. First results of a novel adjustable-length ossicular reconstruction prosthesis in temporal bones. Laryngoscope. 2016;126: 2559–2564.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: ORP, ossicular replacement prostheses, outcome, temporal boneIssue: November 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Bone Cement Superiority in Ossicular Chain Reconstruction/ Revision Stapes Surgery Not Supported by Evidence
  • Bone Cement and Revision Stapedectomy
  • Is There a “Best” Stapedectomy Prosthesis?
  • Are Post-Operative Hearing Results Better with Titanium Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939