• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Fungal Theory Debated in Amphotericin B Controversy

by Sue Pondrom • March 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

We think there are several implications of this study, Dr. O’Donnell told ENT Today. Assuming that unblinding confirms our interpretation of the blinded data, a fungal-induced inflammation as the cause of chronic sinusitis is a valid paradigm. It’s a host-defined disease where only 10 percent of those exposed to fungi mount an inflammatory response characterized by eosinophils.

You Might Also Like

  • The Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Remains Unclear
  • Is Topical Amphotericin B Efficacious in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis?
  • Report May Change Diagnosis, Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Early Diagnosis, Treatment Essential in Acute Invasive Fungal Sinusitis in Patients with Recent COVID-19 Infection
Explore This Issue
March 2008

He added that Mayo was right. A topical intranasal administration of extremely low doses of antifungals looks like it will be significantly effective at reducing the symptoms and inflammatory changes in the nose and in the sinuses. The clinical trial is suggesting that the vast majority of bona fide CRS cases are due to the fungal-induced inflammation. Although patients in the Phase III study were not selected on the basis of whether or not they had nasal mucin that was positive for eMBP, after enrollment, every patient has tested positive so far for eMBP.

Jens Ponikau, MD

Jens Ponikau, MD

Clearly, the results are incompatible with what was shown by Weschta and Ebbens, Dr. O’Donnell further stated, noting that the studies by the European researchers showed no effect on symptoms or signs, whereas the Accentia trial with 302 patients indicates at the still-blinded point that roughly half of the patients have a significant resolution-not just a reduction in severity-of symptoms and improvement in endoscopy and CT scans of the sinuses.

Dr. Ebbens cautioned, however, that the Accentia results may reflect a placebo effect. Before drawing any conclusions, we should await the unblinded results, she said.

This is the first time that anything for CRS has made it into an FDA-approved Phase III trial, Dr. Ponikau said. No drug or treatment has ever gone that far for CRS. We are careful in what we are saying; we’re saying it’s in development and we’re learning a lot about it, but we’re not there yet.

A lot of patients are going to benefit from the research at the Mayo Clinic, Dr. O’Donnell added. But that research met with incredible skepticism because many people failed to understand what Mayo was saying. They weren’t saying that if you had the fungus, you had the disease. Rather, they were saying it’s a host-defined disease. Virtually everyone has the fungus in the mucus of their nose and sinus. But only 10 percent of the population has an inflammatory response to it.

Maybe Not for Everyone

Neil Bhattacharyya, MD, Associate Professor of Otolaryngology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, would agree, but with a caveat. He said, Amphotericin B is one of the members of our armamentarium that we use to treat chronic rhinosinusitis-in certain cases. I think it has a role in the treatment of a certain subset of CRS, but it’s not, in my opinion, going to be the end-all, be-all answer for why those patients don’t do well with traditional therapy or surgery.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Allergy, Departments, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: allergic sinusitis, CT, debate, fungus, medication, research, rhinosinusitis, Sinusitis, treatmentIssue: March 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • The Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Remains Unclear
  • Is Topical Amphotericin B Efficacious in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis?
  • Report May Change Diagnosis, Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Early Diagnosis, Treatment Essential in Acute Invasive Fungal Sinusitis in Patients with Recent COVID-19 Infection

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939