• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Is Topical Amphotericin B Efficacious in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis?

by Michael Lupa, MD, and Ronald Amedee, MD • January 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

 

You Might Also Like

  • Topical Antibiotic Use Following Sinus Surgery
  • Over-the-Counter Preparation Shows Promise in Biofilm-Associated Chronic Rhinosinusitis Treatment
  • AAO-HNSF 2012: Choosing an Effective Topical Agent to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Is Acupuncture Effective in Reducing Overall Symptomatology in Chronic Rhinosinusitis?
Explore This Issue
January 2013

Trio Best PracticeBackground

The etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) still remains controversial. Evidence has emerged that a fungal-mediated mechanism may be playing a role in the development of this disease process. In light of this, groups have proposed topical treatment of patients with the antifungal drug amphotericin B. Early studies showed some promise with this treatment, but more recent work has not been as positive. Is there sufficient evidence to continue to recommend this treatment for patients diagnosed with CRS?

Best Practice

The majority of large, recent, randomized, controlled trials have shown that topical amphotericin at a variety of concentrations, delivered via several different delivery routes, has proved ineffective in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. At the evaluated concentrations, there is insufficient evidence to continue to recommend this treatment. Higher concentrations may yet prove to be effective, but further study is required. Read the full article in The Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: Amphotericin B, chronic rhinosinusitisIssue: January 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Topical Antibiotic Use Following Sinus Surgery
  • Over-the-Counter Preparation Shows Promise in Biofilm-Associated Chronic Rhinosinusitis Treatment
  • AAO-HNSF 2012: Choosing an Effective Topical Agent to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Is Acupuncture Effective in Reducing Overall Symptomatology in Chronic Rhinosinusitis?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939