• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • March 4, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

For those who aspire to become a clinician-investigator, the holistic model supports exploration of a research career without placing undue pressure on those whose clinical interests emphasize other areas such as education, global health, or entrepreneurship. As he explains, “that way, research years remain available and supported for those with an interest in scholarship or innovation.”

You Might Also Like

  • How Some Specialties Are Getting Innovative with Medical Residency Recruitment
  • How Residency Programs and Students Coped With Virtual Match Day
  • Will Otolaryngology Match Numbers Continue to Rise?
  • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
Explore This Issue
March 2026

He also noted that lengthening the on-ramp workforce entry across applicants can have undesirable downstream consequences, including creating hurdles to entry, increased educational debt, and a reduction of overall years in clinical practice. Over time, such trends could affect the diversity of the specialty and overall access to otolaryngology care.

M. Boyd Gillespie, MD, MSc, professor and chair in the department of otolaryngology–head and neck cancer at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis, Tenn., is not a big fan of the trend in increasing research among medical students, as he sees it mostly as a new metric to make an applicant competitive that doesn’t really distinguish who will potentially be the best doctor. He noted that although the volume of research has gone up, the quality hasn’t. “In the past, people did research out of an organic interest and out of a desire for discovery,” he said.

“Now, because research has become a metric for competitiveness, it is a lot more about checking a box, and I don’t see a lot of joy in discovery in many of the students who are now doing research,” he said, adding that he sees it as unfortunate that students feel pressure to do research.

Dr. Gillespie would like to see assessment of trainees return to a more composite evaluation based on grades, board scores, clinical performance, interview, and research if involved. He says research, unfortunately, has become a proxy for intellectual ability.

He also said the pressure to add a research year during medical school puts an extra financial burden on an already hefty debt load. As more people delay entering the workforce with an increased financial burden, he thinks that may make people more focused on financial concerns than they should be for their first job, given that they feel they need to maximize income sooner.

Perspectives from the Applicants

Nneoma Wamkpah, MD, MSCI, assistant professor in the department of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at Stanford Medicine, in San Jose, Calif., who just started her first position as a facial plastic surgeon, chose to do a two-year research program during residency to enhance her chances of getting a fellowship in the subspecialty of facial plastic surgery—a career goal she had since medical school. “From the beginning, I had a plan of what I wanted to do,” she said. “I think it was helpful to do the research for matching, but there are plenty of people who don’t do research and have successful matching as well.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Career, Career Development, Cover Article, Features, Home Slider, Medical Education Tagged With: gap year, trends in researchIssue: March 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • How Some Specialties Are Getting Innovative with Medical Residency Recruitment
  • How Residency Programs and Students Coped With Virtual Match Day
  • Will Otolaryngology Match Numbers Continue to Rise?
  • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever participated in a professional group's advocacy or Hill Day event?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Taking Otolaryngology Call in the ED and Hospital: Duty or Burden?
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Society Debuts TRIO Leadership Academy
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • How to Have Effective Presurgical Discussions
    • Advocacy: Finding Our Voice
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939