• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Gifting Season Can Present Ethical Dilemma for Physicians

by Susan Kreimer • December 1, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Another aspect to consider is the possible influence of the gift’s timing—whether it occurs during treatment or after medical care has been completed. If it is given before treatment is over, “a certain kind of conflict of interest comes up,” said Dr. Hester. “It could act as an inducement for special treatment, for going above and beyond, and it could influence the physician in a way that makes him or her act differently.” However, the same concerns apply if treatment may need to resume at a later time, and it’s tough to always predict when and if a patient will call upon your services again, he said. There is no denying “the psychology of reciprocity,” Dr. Hester added. “We know from research that humans are moved to reciprocate when given even as little as a dime from someone else. So, even the well-meaning gift-giver may unintentionally receive special treatment.”

You Might Also Like

  • Digital Dilemma: Physicians oppose EHR requirements
  • What Are Physicians’ Ethical Responsibilities to Respond to Medical Emergencies?
  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • Drug Marketing: Different Impacts on Different Physicians
Explore This Issue
December 2012
Daniel Samadi, MD “We’re all human beings and we can be influenced, but again, in the ideal world, you need to treat everybody equally.”

—Daniel Samadi, MD, pediatric otolaryngologist in Hackensack, N.J.

AMA Guidelines

The American Medical Association (AMA) has established ethical policies on gifts to physicians from patients and industry. The policy states:

“Gifts that patients offer to physicians are often an expression of appreciation and gratitude or a reflection of cultural tradition, and can enhance the patient-physician relationship. Some gifts signal psychological needs that require the physician’s attention. Some patients may attempt to influence care or to secure preferential treatment through the offering of gifts or cash. Acceptance of such gifts is likely to damage the integrity of the patient-physician relationship.”

The AMA also urges physicians to “make clear that gifts given to secure preferential treatment compromise their obligation to provide services in a fair manner.” Nonetheless, the group offered “no definitive rules to determine when a physician should or should not accept a gift.” It added that “no fixed value determines the appropriateness or inappropriateness of a gift from a patient; however, the gift’s value relative to the patient’s or the physician’s means should not be disproportionately or inappropriately large.”

Among the issues highlighted by the AMA is whether a physician would feel comfortable if colleagues or the public knew about the gift’s acceptance. The policy advises caution if patients mention gifts in the context of a will, insisting that these conversations must not influence medical care. “If, after a patient’s death, a physician should learn that he or she has been bequeathed a gift,” the policy states “the physician should consider declining the gift if the physician believes that its acceptance would present a significant hardship (financial or emotional) to the family.” The AMA noted that “the interaction of these various factors is complex and requires the physician to consider them sensitively.”

Steven Handler, MD “Recently, I received a gift card, and I sent it back to the family, saying, ‘I really appreciate the sentiments and your good wishes, but I’m not able to accept this by our hospital regulations.’ ”

—Steven Handler, MD, pediatric otolaryngologist in Philadelphia

Determine Where to Draw the Line

Even with this guidance, physicians aren’t entirely sure where to draw the line or how to assign monetary value to a gift, said Paul Helft, MD, an associate professor of medicine at the Indiana University School of Medicine and director of the Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics at Indiana University Health in Indianapolis. Dr. Helft has looked after very wealthy patients for whom giving a set of theater tickets or an elaborate gift basket presumably wouldn’t pose financial hardship. Still, regardless of a patient’s net worth, “if somebody said, ‘I want to give you a car,’ that would be a gift that I feel I had to refuse,” he said. “Refusing such a gift would be understood as a matter of principle.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics, Practice Management Tagged With: Ethics, gifts, patient satisfaction, practice managementIssue: December 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Digital Dilemma: Physicians oppose EHR requirements
  • What Are Physicians’ Ethical Responsibilities to Respond to Medical Emergencies?
  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • Drug Marketing: Different Impacts on Different Physicians

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939