• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Help or Hoopla?: Surgical robots can benefit otolaryngology

by Jennifer L.W. Fink • July 4, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. coordinates a certification program that includes basic robotic techniques, an eight-hour lab involving pigs and a half day of surgeon-led cadaver training and case observation, followed by proctoring during the first few independent cases.

You Might Also Like

  • The Future of Robotic Surgery in Otolaryngology
  • Robotics for Head and Neck Surgery: The Wave of the Future?
  • Scarless Surgery: The benefits and drawbacks of robotic thryroidectomy
  • SM14: Advances in Otolaryngology Improve Surgical Techniques, Treatment of Common Disorders
Explore This Issue
July 2011

The SRS also recently began offering a transoral robotic surgery fellowship certification for fellows who graduate from SRS-certified programs. Fellowship certification programs include a didactics program approved by the SRS (typically about 20 hours worth of work) and plenty of console time (up to 90 hours); porcine and cadaver training are encouraged but not required.

“We know from the data submitted to the FDA that the learning curve is about 20 cases, so we require that the fellow sits at the console for 20 cases and that they assist on ten other cases,” Dr. Weinstein said. “In that way, we know that the graduating fellows meet certain standards before they start doing robotic surgery.”

Post-graduate robotic training involves approximately 25 hours worth of online, console and laboratory training, Dr. Weinstein said.

Whatever your path to certification, practice is the key to proficiency. “Doing one case every two or three months is not going to get you through the learning curve,” Dr. Kuppersmith said. “You have to have a sufficient volume of these cases to warrant going through the learning curve and to make it worth your while.”

Robotic surgeons say TORS and robotic thyroidectomy are just the beginning. “We’re now in robotics where we were with sinus surgery in the 1980s,” Dr. Eibling said. “We’re still developing the instrumentation, the indications, the procedures and the strategies that are required to move us forward.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Practice Management, Tech Talk Tagged With: head and neck surgery, robotic surgery, technologyIssue: July 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • The Future of Robotic Surgery in Otolaryngology
  • Robotics for Head and Neck Surgery: The Wave of the Future?
  • Scarless Surgery: The benefits and drawbacks of robotic thryroidectomy
  • SM14: Advances in Otolaryngology Improve Surgical Techniques, Treatment of Common Disorders

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has experience as a patient influenced your professional development or demeanor?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Path to Department Chair: Arriving and Thriving

    • How Audiologists and Researchers Are Shaping Military Hearing Health Practices

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Why So Loud? Rethinking the Volume of Our Everyday Experiences
    • How Audiologists and Researchers Are Shaping Military Hearing Health Practices
    • A Case for Endoscopic Surgery: How Personal Experience Influenced Pursuit of a New Skill
    • The Path to Department Chair: Arriving and Thriving
    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939