• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How to Prevent Medical Diagnostic Errors

by Jill U Adams • September 7, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Address Errors Created in Systems

Many systems errors are those involving delays in patients seeing a specialist or getting a diagnostic test, as well as delays in getting test results back to the initial physician. And, beyond a slowly moving system of communication, there are errors in the communication itself.

You Might Also Like

  • AAO-HNS14: Medical Bias Explored As Cause of Medical Errors
  • Few Medical Errors are Reported
  • Admitting Medical Errors Can Help Physicians Learn from Mistakes
  • Small Changes, Stark Differences: Errors in Otolaryngology
Explore This Issue
September 2014

Physicians may rely on their own reading of a scan or the written notes that accompany it rather than talk to the radiologist, said Dr. Graber. Subtleties or secondary, nonobvious findings might be missed. These things are easily communicated in a live conversation, but it can be next to impossible to get two physicians on the phone at the same time. “Why doesn’t this happen? Because communication is burdensome,” Dr. Shah said. “The radiologist’s call interrupts my work flow. I call him back and interrupt his work flow.”

Better notes could help, but it’s complicated by the variety of systems. “Even notes are tricky, because different facilities use different EMR platforms and they’re not compatible,” Dr. Shah said.

Checklists, which are are becoming more popular with surgeons, are sometimes very group specific, built for a particular specialty at a particular hospital. But so far these tend to be more procedural than diagnostic. Usually you start with the diagnosis and then the decision tree follows, Dr. Folbe said.

Computerized diagnostic algorithms may be a physician’s tool of the future, but for now simply recognizing one’s limits would help. “We’re not supercomputers,” Dr. Folbe said. “It’s okay to look things up. It’s okay for physicians to admit they don’t know something or to consult with their colleagues.”

The focus on systems is worthy, but a true human factors analysis is a big investment of time and resources. “For a small otolaryngology practice, there’s no budget for this,” Dr. Shah said.

He offered up a low-cost solution: the pneumonic STAR, which stands for stop, think, act, review. “It’s very simple but it can be very helpful,” Dr. Shah said. “For me, it’s a reminder to stop and focus on what’s in front of me,” he adds, whether it’s a patient or a scan or a prescription. Even if—or especially if—your pager is buzzing.


Jill Adams is a freelance writer based in New York.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: diagnosisIssue: September 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • AAO-HNS14: Medical Bias Explored As Cause of Medical Errors
  • Few Medical Errors are Reported
  • Admitting Medical Errors Can Help Physicians Learn from Mistakes
  • Small Changes, Stark Differences: Errors in Otolaryngology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939