• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How Will You Score? ABOto to launch MOC quality component

by Thomas R. Collins • January 13, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

He said there is good reason for that.

You Might Also Like

  • New Quality Indicator: MOC promotes better care, ABOto director says
  • From the ABOto: MOC 2012 Update
  • New Oral Cavity Cancer Quality Measures Included in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for Otolaryngologists
  • ABOto Credentials and Ethics Committee Oversees Certification Eligibility, Retention
Explore This Issue
January 2012

“Participation in MOC may have fiscal advantages, and it may be closely linked to maintenance of your state medical license,” he said. “So those are two giant carrots, together with what I think is the most important carrot, which is to improve patient care. That, I think, ultimately will win the day.”

Dr. Miller said it is a great opportunity to get the best kind of education: feedback related specifically to your own work.

“In other words, this is what a diplomate does,” he said. “So then he/she can focus particularly on those areas that could be improved in things that you actually do and see the results of it.”

Maintenance of Certification: FOUR PARTS

Maintenance of Certification: FOUR PARTS

Part I: Professional Standing

  • Must have certificate from the American Board of Otolaryngology
  • Must have an unrestricted medical license
  • Must maintain privileges at hospital/ambulatory surgery center

Part II: Continuing Education and Self-Assessment

  • Part of a lifelong learning program
  • 25 CME units per year
  • Completion of self-assessment program that is clinically oriented, is specialty specific and is aided by online modules
  • Non-punitive assessment

Part III: Cognitive Examination

  • Secure, closed-book exam administered at testing centers around the country
  • Totally clinical, no basic science
  • 80 questions: 12 on fundamentals, and the other 68 on a selected practice area
  • Focuses on specific practice, with clinical fundamentals and one specialty module
  • Cannot be used to imply subcertification, except for neurotology and sleep medicine

Part IV: Performance in Practice

  • Based on a quality improvement approach
  • Will look at doctor-patient interaction and outcomes
  • Will meet Physician Quality Reporting System requirement

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: ABOto, education, health policy, maintenance of certification, Medicare, Performance in PracticeIssue: January 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • New Quality Indicator: MOC promotes better care, ABOto director says
  • From the ABOto: MOC 2012 Update
  • New Oral Cavity Cancer Quality Measures Included in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for Otolaryngologists
  • ABOto Credentials and Ethics Committee Oversees Certification Eligibility, Retention

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939