ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

If Not Maintenance of Certification, What?

by Robert H. Miller MD, MBA • July 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Maintenance of Certification: An Update
  • Certlink Offers New Option for Maintenance of Certification
  • New Option for Maintenance of Certification
  • The Controversy Over Maintenance of Certification
Explore This Issue
July 2013
Robert H. Miller, MD, MBA “I do not think I deserved an “A” for every patient I treated, which was the basis for trying to improve my practice. This is the essence of MOC, which seems to be lost in the discussion.”

—Robert H. Miller, MD, MBA

The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) maintenance of certification (MOC) program was a hot topic of discussion at the recent American Medical Association House of Delegates meeting, which took place June 13-19 in Chicago. Several anti-

MOC motions were made, with some passing the House. It seems the basic issue for some doctors (but certainly not for all of the delegates) is that they do not want to do MOC. Some of the more vocal participants said they practice the latest medicine flawlessly and don’t need anyone to improve their practice or encourage lifelong learning, particularly the ABMS boards’ MOC program.

To me, perhaps the most notable quote from an MOC opponent was, “If I see 15 patients a day, that’s 15 tests a day. And I have to get an “A” on each one.” I presume this doctor is grading herself, which has just a few inherent flaws. I can honestly say that I do not think I deserved an “A” for every patient I treated, which was the basis for trying to improve my practice. This is the essence of MOC, which seems to be lost in the discussion.

Many of the delegates were very thoughtful in their concerns about MOC: “Does it work?”; “It is yet another expense?”—with some stating that MOC is just a way for the boards to make money. Another delegate added, “It takes time out of my practice when I could be seeing patients.”

I’d like to address each of these important questions.

1. Does It Work?

Although MOC has only been in existence since 2002, there is some evidence that MOC is effective. The ABMS website (abms.org) has information on studies of MOC. As more physicians participate in MOC and as the program itself is refined, more studies should and will be done to document what works and how to improve the system.

2. It’s Just a Way for the Boards to Make Money

The American Board of Otolaryngology (ABOto) has recently reduced the price of its MOC program to $310 a year, which covers all four components. The ABOto financial policy is that all of its products (tests, MOC, etc.) should cover their production and adminstration costs, with no intention of making a profit off any of the products. The MOC fees are currently not covering all of its expenses, a situation that will change as more diplomates participate. When this happens, a combination of a reduced fee and program improvements will be implemented.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Viewpoint Tagged With: ABMS, American Board of Medical Specialties, maintenance of certification, MOCIssue: July 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Maintenance of Certification: An Update
  • Certlink Offers New Option for Maintenance of Certification
  • New Option for Maintenance of Certification
  • The Controversy Over Maintenance of Certification

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Otolaryngologists Have a Major Role to Play in Treating COVID-19 Long-Haulers
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Podcasts Becoming More Popular Method of Education for Otolaryngologists
    • How to Embrace Optimism in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Tips on How to Approach Conversations with Patients about the COVID-19 Vaccine
    • Steps You Should Take to Protect Your Voice and Hearing During Telemedicine Sessions
    • Routine Postoperative Adjunct Treatments Unnecessary for Idiopathic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Polls

Have you spoken with your patients about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.