• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Imaging at a Crossroads: CT scan providers urged to initiate accreditation

by Gretchen Henkel • February 28, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The IAC, established in 1989, uses an intersocietal approach, drawing from a range of medical specialties—in addition to radiology—to develop its program standards for a variety of testing modalities.These include CT, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and others. The board of directors responsible for generating the CT standards included AAO-HNS members Dr. Setzen and Arnold Noyek, MD, professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the University of Toronto. The ICACTL accreditation program offers a pathway for otolaryngologists who both perform and interpret their scans, providing they meet one of the training and experience pathways as outlined in the standards. For the established practice pathway, for example, the medical director must have a minimum of five years of CT experience, have at least 150 hours of Category 1 CME, have interpreted a minimum of 500 CT examinations, and have radiation safety training. To view other training and experience pathways and additional requirements, download the ICACTL Standards at icactl.org/icactl/main/icactl_standards.htm.

You Might Also Like

  • To Accredit or Not to Accredit?: Accreditation Soon May Be Required for In-Office CT Scanners: Part 2 of 3
  • Demystifying the ACGME: Your guide to understanding the residency accreditation body
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • A Partner in the Business: Practices see mid-level providers as valuable additions
Explore This Issue
March 2011

The Joint Commission’s approach, according to Michael Kulczycki, executive director of the Ambulatory Care Accreditation Program, is to accredit the practice instead of simply the imaging technology, with attention to both patient and staff safety. To meet the CMS mandate for ADI accreditation, The Joint Commission has an add-on option to its accreditation process that includes assessment of the equipment and operating personnel.

“We do an on-site survey for every applicant and a re-survey every three years,” Kulczycki said. “Our on-site process is a major part of our accreditation process.” The Joint Commission has been receiving applications from oral and maxillofacial surgeons who use the cone beam technology. For more information, go to jointcommission.org/Imaging or surveymonkey.com/s/DGNFF7M

Unless otolaryngologists are using conventional CT technology, the ICACTL “makes the most sense for the average ENT practitioner,” Dr. Sillers said. “The lion’s share of the CTs otolaryngologists perform are paranasal sinus and temporal bone,” he pointed out.

Accreditation Timelines and Costs

The accreditation process takes approximately nine to 12 weeks with ICACTL, and the average cost for an ENT practice is $2400.

The usual timeline for granting accreditation with the ACR, according to Wilcox, is 90 days from the time phantom images are submitted. The cost is approximately $2500.

Accreditation with The Joint Commission takes three to four months from the application date, and the cost to accredit a single-site imaging center with the ADI option starts at $10,940, depending on total patient volume and number of sites and modalities (with a built-in plan to amortize payments over a three-year period). “Where we think we offer some value is for imaging companies with multiple sites and multiple modalities, where our process can become more cost efficient,” Kulczycki said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Practice Management, Tech Talk Tagged With: in-office testing, practice management, scanningIssue: March 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • To Accredit or Not to Accredit?: Accreditation Soon May Be Required for In-Office CT Scanners: Part 2 of 3
  • Demystifying the ACGME: Your guide to understanding the residency accreditation body
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • A Partner in the Business: Practices see mid-level providers as valuable additions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939