• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Transnasal Tracheoesophageal Punctures Yield Good Results

by Thomas R. Collins • November 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Mark Persky, MD, Chair of the Department of Otolaryngology at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York, said that the findings were encouraging, and might be another step into the expanding array of in-office procedures.

You Might Also Like

  • Transnasal Esophagoscopy: A Viable Alternative to Conventional Procedures
  • In-Office Transnasal Esophagoscopy Appears Safe, Cost-Effective
  • Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration Techniques Evaluated
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology
Explore This Issue
November 2009

He said it was especially nice to see that the procedures in the office worked well for patients who had had reconstructive surgeries beforehand. Performing a prosthetic procedure on a patient at the same time as reconstruction is done is often not ideal because of the added strain.

It’s a good point to bring out, Dr. Persky said. I think that this can be done even in patients who you’re reluctant to do it on as an initial approach. You do it as a delayed procedure, and the fact that they can do it in the office under local anesthesia, I think, is a wonderful thing.

He said that he does not currently perform these procedures in the office, but said, I could see doing it after this, sure.

Having the procedure done in the office is less stressful on the patient-and on the bottom line, he said. Most patients would like to avoid an inpatient experience if they could, he said. I think that for the patient experience, it works out well. For cost consciousness, it works out very well also.

©2009 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Laryngology, Rhinology Tagged With: laryngectomy, patient satisfaction, research, speech pathology, TEPIssue: November 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Transnasal Esophagoscopy: A Viable Alternative to Conventional Procedures
  • In-Office Transnasal Esophagoscopy Appears Safe, Cost-Effective
  • Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration Techniques Evaluated
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you served as an expert witness in a case that’s gone to trial?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
    • Composition and Priorities of Multidisciplinary Pediatric Thyroid Programs: A Consensus Statement
    • Artificial Intelligence as Author: Can Scientific Reviewers Recognize GPT- 4o–Generated Manuscripts?
    • Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item WETT
    • Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure May Increase Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis: Results from an Exposure-Matched Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939