• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Transnasal Tracheoesophageal Punctures Yield Good Results

by Thomas R. Collins • November 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) performed in the office on total-laryngectomy patients, using transnasal esophagoscopy, yielded good results, researchers have reported.

You Might Also Like

  • Transnasal Esophagoscopy: A Viable Alternative to Conventional Procedures
  • In-Office Transnasal Esophagoscopy Appears Safe, Cost-Effective
  • Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration Techniques Evaluated
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology
Explore This Issue
November 2009

Nearly all of the 39 procedures reviewed in the retrospective study were successful, and speech results were also good, said Brad LeBert, MD, of the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the Louisiana State Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, in a presentation at the 2009 annual meeting of the American Head and Neck Society, held as part of the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meeting.

The patient was able to avoid the risk of general anesthesia, and this also offered a decreased cost of the procedure, not only to the patient, but also to the hospital, Dr. LeBert said.

In-office tracheoesophageal prosthesis placement with the use of transnasal esophagoscopy [TNE] is a very viable procedure to be done by any otolaryngologist familiar with TNE techniques, said Amy Hessel, MD, Assistant Professor of Head and Neck Surgery at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) in Houston, and one of the surgeons who performed the procedures. This procedure utilizes principles and procedures that all otolaryngologists are familiar with-endoscopy and Seldinger technique.

She cautioned that there are key points that must not be forgotten. While this procedure is technically easy and provides an excellent service for those patients rendered aphonic from laryngectomy, there are a few aspects that must not be overlooked, she said. It is absolutely imperative that these patients be supported by a speech pathology group who are familiar with TEP and are able to assist with initial candidate assessment, TEP placement, vocal instruction, and maintenance of the prosethesis.

Background on TEP

Tracheoesophageal puncture, introduced in 1980, can be done either at the time of the total laryngectomy, as a primary procedure, or later as in a secondary procedure. Using TNE for the procedure was introduced in 2003 by Bach, Postma, and Koufman (Laryngoscope 2003;113: 173-6).

The procedure used in the study presented by Dr. LeBert, performed at LSU Health Sciences Center and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, involves keeping the patient awake without any sedation, using only local anesthesia. TNE is used for endoscopic guidance. The puncture is made either using a direct puncture method or the Seldinger technique, in which a hollow needle is used to make the puncture, allowing a guidewire to be passed through.

There are several scopes available for transnasal esophagoscopy. The one used in this study was the Olympus model. They all have varying benefits associated with them, Dr. LeBert said. They all share the common factor that they have a very small diameter of about 5 millimeters. This allows for easy passage through the nose and into the nasopharynx. A traditional esophagascope has an average diameter of 13 mm.

TEP Study

The retrospective review covered 39 patients receiving the treatment from January of 2004 to December of 2008. Their average age was 65, ranging from 47 to 83. Eighty-two percent were male.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Laryngology, Rhinology Tagged With: laryngectomy, patient satisfaction, research, speech pathology, TEPIssue: November 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Transnasal Esophagoscopy: A Viable Alternative to Conventional Procedures
  • In-Office Transnasal Esophagoscopy Appears Safe, Cost-Effective
  • Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration Techniques Evaluated
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939