• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Ultrasound Provides Benefits to Both Patients and Physicians

by Sheri J. Polley • April 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

When billing for diagnostic ultrasound and USFNA, thorough supporting documentation is essential, and the images must be retained as part of the patient’s medical record. The authors do caution that ultrasound cannot be billed as a screening tool or as part of the general physical examination.

You Might Also Like

  • Sialendoscopy More Cost-Effective than Medical Management with Diagnostic Ultrasound for RAIS
  • Communicating with Patients and Staff via Electronic Office Communication Systems
  • Lean Neck Mass Clinic Model Reduces Time to Diagnosis
  • Ultrasound-Guided Needle Dye Injection by Surgeon Localizes Tumor
Explore This Issue
April 2007

Based on current Medicare reimbursement for the appropriate CPT codes, the authors of the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery study determined that if one USFNA is performed per week, and one diagnostic ultrasound is performed each weekday, it would offset a $30,000 equipment purchase and certification cost in one year.

The indications for ultrasound in otolaryngology are well recognized. Because ultrasound is noninvasive, there really are no risks or contraindications to its use. In-office ultrasound can provide otolaryngologists with better information more quickly and reduce the anxiety of patients in a convenient, cost-effective manner. The incorporation of this technology into the office setting offers the opportunity to better utilize it to full diagnostic advantage.

©2007 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: April 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Sialendoscopy More Cost-Effective than Medical Management with Diagnostic Ultrasound for RAIS
  • Communicating with Patients and Staff via Electronic Office Communication Systems
  • Lean Neck Mass Clinic Model Reduces Time to Diagnosis
  • Ultrasound-Guided Needle Dye Injection by Surgeon Localizes Tumor

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939