• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Innovation and Intellectual Property in Otolaryngology

by Renée Bacher • May 16, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Kozin believes the downside to engaging with an academic incubator is limited and taking advantage of these resources will provide expert knowledge not commonly taught at traditional medical schools or in otolaryngology residency programs. As far as whether the innovator still owns the invention when the work is done through these offices, arrangements vary from institution to institution.

You Might Also Like

  • The Need for Innovation in Otolaryngology
  • Letter from the Editor: Recent Feats of Innovation in Otolaryngology
  • How to Develop New Products, Ideas in Otolaryngology
  • Innovation in Cochlear Impant Surgery
Explore This Issue
May 2023

“Most academic incubators are supported through either an affiliated hospital or university,” Dr. Kozin said. “Those using academic incubators either within the university setting or externally should clarify intellectual property ownership at the onset of the relationship.”

What Makes a Good Incubator?

While there can be many advantages to working with a business incubator, there are certain factors that make some incubators rise above the others: primarily, funding and experience.

“Stanford and Silicon Valley, for example, have access to billions, if not trillions, of dollars in capital that most universities can’t match,” said Dr. Das. “And they have a track record of producing highly profitable inventions and commercializing them.”

In addition to having enough funding to truly back your ideas, the best incubators have also been competing in their space for many years and have confronted problems, learned from their mistakes, and developed valuable contacts. They learn from their successes and failures what it takes to make money and put inventors on a good path from.

High-quality incubators also have multiple ancillaries. Y Combinator, Mountain View, Calif. (www.ycombinator.com) offer a blueprint for how to form a startup and gives seed money for early-stage inventions. It also holds an annual Demo Day to show startups to potential investors and hosts a startup school.

“They give you documents on how to raise money from friends and family, how to write a basic LLC, and how to make an invention agreement formatted so that you don’t ever, for example, split a company 50/50 with your partner, but rather really figure out what each partner is contributing to be sure everyone thinks it’s fair and there’s zero resentment later,” says Dr. Das.

Poor quality incubators, on the other hand, may not have enough of the right staff members to be truly helpful. For example, they may have one attorney who’s great at patent work, but they may not have a marketing expert who can help an inventor get their idea noticed. “Finding what works can take a lot of time,” Dr. Das said. “There are only a handful of academic centers in this country that produce inventions regularly and get them commercialized.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: innovation, inventionIssue: May 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • The Need for Innovation in Otolaryngology
  • Letter from the Editor: Recent Feats of Innovation in Otolaryngology
  • How to Develop New Products, Ideas in Otolaryngology
  • Innovation in Cochlear Impant Surgery

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you experienced an increase in in-office rhinology procedures in the last year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • ChatGPT-Generated “Fake” References in Academic Manuscripts Is a Problem 

    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Questions on NIH Funding Leave ENT Researchers Pondering Next Steps and Leaving Everything Up in the Air
    • In-Office Rhinology Practices Continue to Grow
    • How Do We Define “Winning” in the OR?
    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
    • How To: Superior Maximization of Sphenoidotomy with Olfaction Preservation in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939