• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Is Highly Effective in Nonrecurrent Laryngeal Nerve Identification

by Amy E. Hamaker • September 24, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the electrophysiological parameters of the nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve (NRLN), and how efficient is intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) for successful NRLN identification?

Bottom line
IONM is highly effective in NRLN identification. Right vagus nerve latency in the NRLN group was found to be significantly shorter than in the RLN group.

You Might Also Like

  • Intraoperative Nerve Latency Measurements Can Indicate Post-Op Neural Function
  • Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring No Better Than ID Alone
  • What Is the Correlation Between EMG Waveforms, Muscle Activation During Intraoperative Neural Monitoring?
  • ALEs an Alternative to Endotracheal Tube Electrode Neural Monitoring
Explore This Issue
September 2017

Background: The NRLN is a common anatomic variation of the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), which has been associated with an increased risk of injury during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Previous reports suggest that the NRLN may be under-recognized and under-reported, and paresis and paralysis rates may be 10 times higher than the typical RLN. International neural monitoring guidelines call for routine and systematic use of nerve-stimulating equipment in RLN dissection, but there are very limited published data on the value of nerve monitoring for NRLN identification.

Study design: Retrospective database analysis of 15 NRLNs in a total 682 laryngeal nerves from a single surgeon at a tertiary care center between January 2012 and December 2015.

Setting: Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans.

Intraoperative view of a right nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve as captured during right thyroidectomy in one of our cases. (A) Right nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve. (B) Right common carotid artery. (C) Retracted right thyroid lobe. Credit: © The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Intraoperative view of a right nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve as captured during right thyroidectomy in one of our cases. (A) Right nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve. (B) Right common carotid artery. (C) Retracted right thyroid lobe.

Credit: © The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Synopsis: Fifteen NRLNs were identified; all were right sided. Final diagnosis after surgical pathology was malignancy in seven of 15 cases (47%) and a benign disease in eight of 15 cases (53%). Stimulation of the NRLN was performed using 1 mA. Stimulation threshold for the right vagus nerve was 3 mA. The mean initial NRLN amplitude was 1010.5 µV ± 491.59 µV, with a range of 218 to 1,805 µV. The mean final NRLN amplitude was 859.31 µV ± 492.08 µV, with a range of 200 to 1,600 µV. The mean initial amplitudes of the right NRLN, right RLN, right vagus nerve, and both RLNs were compared using analysis of variance and found to be statistically significant. The mean initial NRLN latency was 1.06 ± 0.25 ms, with a range of 0.6 to 1.6 ms. The mean final NRLN latency was 1.09 ± 0.26 ms, with a range of 0.6 to 1.7 ms. Comparison of NRLN, right RLN, and left RLN latencies was significant. The latency associated with right vagus nerve stimulation in the NRLN group when compared with that of RLN group was significantly shorter. Limitations included limited ability to extrapolate to a larger patient population due to a small number of NRLN cases from a single surgeon.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: intraoperative nerve monitoring, nerve monitoring, nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve identification, NRLN, thyroid surgeryIssue: September 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Intraoperative Nerve Latency Measurements Can Indicate Post-Op Neural Function
  • Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring No Better Than ID Alone
  • What Is the Correlation Between EMG Waveforms, Muscle Activation During Intraoperative Neural Monitoring?
  • ALEs an Alternative to Endotracheal Tube Electrode Neural Monitoring

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939