• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Is Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Useful in the Evaluation of Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss?

by Greg Licameli, MD, and Margaret A. Kenna, MD, MPH • April 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best PracticeBackground

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have become an essential part of the evaluation of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Anomalies are found in 20 percent to 39 percent of patients, ranging from major anatomic abnormalities to subtle dysplasia. Although each aspect of the evaluation contributes to management and treatment options, disagreement persists with regard to the most cost-effective and clinically useful imaging studies in the evaluation of SNHL.

You Might Also Like

  • MRI, CT Imaging Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • What Is the Optimal Workup for a Child with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss?
  • Early Cytomegalovirus Testing Can Detect Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Very Young Children
Explore This Issue
April 2013

Best Practice

The decision to use CT or MRI should be made depending on the presentation of the SNHL (presence of mixed hearing loss, laterality, patient history, diagnosis of ANSD). In general, CT is able to capture many of the anatomic abnormalities that cause SNHL. Due to its lower cost and quicker procedure time, it may be a better initial choice in pediatric patients with unilateral or asymmetric SNHL or mixed hearing loss. However, in the case of ANSD, it is advisable to pursue MRI as the primary imaging study to determine the status of the cochlear nerve, auditory pathways and brain.

Moreover, if the patient is being evaluated as a candidate for CI, and depending on the underlying cause and degree of the SNHL, a dual approach may be useful as both a surgical planning, diagnostic and outcome tool. As MRI acquisition time becomes shorter and therefore more likely to be accomplished in children without sedation, MRI of the temporal bones and brain may become the initial study of choice in both straightforward SNHL as well as ANSD, with selected use of CT based on MRI findings or other clinical indications. Read the full article in The Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric, Pediatric, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: cochlear implant, computed tomography, CT Scan, MRI, pediatricsIssue: April 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • MRI, CT Imaging Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • What Is the Optimal Workup for a Child with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss?
  • Early Cytomegalovirus Testing Can Detect Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Very Young Children

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939