Roger L. Crumley, MD, MBA, Professor and former Chair of the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, and current President of the American Laryngological Association, has no doubts about the advantages of laryngeal reinnervation over other treatments for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. After 30 years of performing the procedure and seeing what it has done for his patients, Dr. Crumley gives it the ultimate endorsement: I would certainly have it done. I think it’s a wonderful procedure!
Explore this issue:
January 2009Laryngeal reinnervation has the ability to restore phonation to near-normal after the healing period. So why is it not more widely embraced by otolaryngologists and patients? ENT Today recently talked with Dr. Crumley and other otolaryngologists experienced with laryngeal reinnervation about its advantages and disadvantages-and about its low profile as a useful treatment.
The Crux of the Technique
Patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis can be treated by a variety of procedures, including injection laryngoplasty, thyroplasty, or reinnervation, explained Joel H. Blumin, MD, Chief of the Division of Laryngology and Professional Voice and Associate Professor of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee. Dr. Blumin has performed the technique numerous times. He recently reported, with colleague Albert L. Merati, MD, Associate Professor and Chief of Laryngology Service in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle, on a series of patients who underwent either laryngeal reinnervation with nerve-nerve anastomosis or laryngeal framework surgery. They found that reinnervation was not associated with any additional risks over laryngeal framework surgery.1
| | | Next → | Single Page