• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Laser vs. Manual Penetration of Stapes Footplate

by George T. Hashisaki, MD • December 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is there a difference in the effect on the bone conduction threshold of two different techniques of penetrating the stapes footplate during otosclerosis surgery?

Background: Surgery for otosclerosis has changed little over the past 50 years. The addition of surgical lasers has allowed creation of a hole in the stapes footplate with less physical contact than with a surgical instrument such as a straight pick. A laser interaction with the footplate still involves a transfer of energy, however. Comparisons of surgical outcomes with or without the use of lasers have shown comparable results.

You Might Also Like

  • Extent of ELS Resections Determines Vocal Quality Following Transoral Laser Microsurgery
  • Bone Cement Superiority in Ossicular Chain Reconstruction/ Revision Stapes Surgery Not Supported by Evidence
  • KTP and CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy Compared
  • Audiologic and Surgical Outcomes in Endoscopic Revision Stapes Surgery
Explore This Issue
December 2013

Study design: Retrospective review of 302 patients from a tertiary medical center. One hundred eighty patients underwent stapedectomy with the use of a CO2 laser, and 122 patients underwent stapedectomy using a manual technique of footplate perforation, with no randomization. Bone conduction thresholds were measured pre-operatively, then again on the first and fourth post-operative day, one month post-operatively and one year post-operatively.

Synopsis: Three hundred two patients had post-operative testing on the first and fourth post-operative days. There was a small but statistically significant decline in bone conduction thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz for both time points and for both techniques. Two hundred eighty patients had testing at the one-month post-operative stage. There was a return to the pre-operative bone conduction level at 0.5 and 1 kHz, but a persisting decline at 2 and 4 kHz. One hundred twenty-five patients had post-operative testing at one year. All frequencies tested showed that the bone conduction thresholds had returned to or surpassed pre-operative levels. Their data suggest a slightly greater “overclosure” of the bone conduction threshold for the patients undergoing laser penetration of the footplate at the one year post-operative evaluation. However, this outcome has to be tempered by the significant decline in the number of patients evaluated at one-year post-operatively—fewer than 50 percent of the original patients.

Bottom line: There does not appear to be a difference in the post-operative bone conduction thresholds between the techniques of laser or manual penetration of the stapes footplate. Early testing within four days of surgery may detect a decline in bone conduction thresholds, but these thresholds appear to return to the pre-operative level over a period of one month to one year.

Citation: Brase C, Keil I, Schwitulla J, et al. Bone conduction after stapes surgery: comparison of CO2 laser and manual perforation. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:821-826.

—Reviewed by George T. Hashisaki, MD

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: [CDATA[Lasers, otosclerosis surgery, stapesIssue: December 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Extent of ELS Resections Determines Vocal Quality Following Transoral Laser Microsurgery
  • Bone Cement Superiority in Ossicular Chain Reconstruction/ Revision Stapes Surgery Not Supported by Evidence
  • KTP and CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy Compared
  • Audiologic and Surgical Outcomes in Endoscopic Revision Stapes Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939