• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Letter from the Editor: How We Can Improve the Otolaryngology Residency Selection Process

by Alexander G. Chiu, MD • April 20, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Three years ago, we published an article entitled “Is there a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?” In 2017, the number of U.S. applicants fell below the number of residency spots available; 14 spots went unfilled that year. It was the culmination of years of Matches, as otolaryngology had earned a reputation as one of the most difficult residencies to match. Faculty were often seen as unwelcoming to junior medical students, and in the years leading up to 2017, residency programs instituted a program-specific paragraph component to the application and trialed a personality fit test. Many students felt that these were both unnecessary and onerous.

You Might Also Like

  • Letter from the Editor: Medicine’s March Madness
  • Standardized Letter of Recommendation Adds Little to Residency Applications
  • Reliance on Exam Scores in Residency Applicant Selection Restricts Diversity in Otolaryngology
  • Letter from the Editor: Residency Graduation Season Is a Reminder That We Remain Impassioned About Community Health
Explore This Issue
April 2021

Many meetings were held, articles were published, and academic residency groups refocused their efforts on recruitment. Nearly every program revived their student interest groups, and residency programs quickly began seeing a 30% increase in applications. Interview days became showcases for programs, with lavish three-course meals replacing box lunches—some programs even paid for hotel accommodations prior to interviews. Now, four years later, the pendulum has swung back in otolaryngology programs’ favor. But at what price?

Match Day was March 19, 2021, and it was a banner day for the specialty. As compared to the 14 unfilled positions in 2017, there were 0 unfilled this year. There were roughly 250 more applicants than positions, and the quality of these was as good as, if not better than, applicants in any year I can remember. Multiple publications, top-of-the-class grades and USMLE scores, meaningful community service projects, and universally glowing letters of recommendation made selection amongst this talented group a bit of a crapshoot. A virtual format that made it easier for applicants and programs to do more interviews without the expense of traveling further underscores how this year was very different from years past. On March 19, I, like nearly every other academic chair and program director in the country, was extremely pleased with the results and eager to meet our new otolaryngology residents.

But there’s a flip side to this story, one our specialty needs to address. There were more than 200 students who did not match, many of whom didn’t have a back-up plan. For the unmatched, there’s a process called the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP) in which they can scramble for jobs over a three-day period of time. Students who had worked for the past three and a half years to become otolaryngologists scrambled to find preliminary surgery, internal medicine, and anesthesiology positions. Students with USMLE scores >250 and AOA who had 20 or so interviews and were dreaming of being an otolaryngology resident at a top academic center found themselves competing for spots in community surgery programs and nonsurgical fields. Some elected to pursue a research fellowship or extended their medical school training by another year to increase their chances of matching next time. Taking on the added expense of another year of med school can help them avoid being branded as a “graduated reapplicant,” as these applications were often triaged out in a program’s interview selection process.

So, what needs to be done? Here are my suggestions:

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Home Slider, Letter From the Editor Tagged With: medical education, medical residencyIssue: April 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Letter from the Editor: Medicine’s March Madness
  • Standardized Letter of Recommendation Adds Little to Residency Applications
  • Reliance on Exam Scores in Residency Applicant Selection Restricts Diversity in Otolaryngology
  • Letter from the Editor: Residency Graduation Season Is a Reminder That We Remain Impassioned About Community Health

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939