• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Standardized Letter of Recommendation Adds Little to Residency Applications

by Amy E. Hamaker • March 11, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Do any of the 10 attributes of the standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR) for the otolaryngology match correlate with objective measures of each applicant?

Bottom Line: Overall, the lack of correlation between SLOR attributes and objective measures suggests the SLOR adds little to the residency application.

You Might Also Like

  • Letter from the Editor: How We Can Improve the Otolaryngology Residency Selection Process
  • New Initiatives Aim to Improve Residency Application, Program Evaluation
  • Letter from the Editor: Medicine’s March Madness
  • Reliance on Exam Scores in Residency Applicant Selection Restricts Diversity in Otolaryngology
Explore This Issue
March 2020

Background: In otolaryngology, the SLOR was first introduced to pediatric otolaryngology fellowships in 2011, and was then implemented into the 2012 match. Although the SLOR has reduced time for letter writers and readers and provided a more objective candidate description, the utility of the SLOR’s 10 individual domains remains questionable.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study of 339 SLORs from 187 otolaryngology residency applicants during the 2016–2017 match application cycle. 

Setting: University of California, Irvine, Calif.

Synopsis: The highest mean and median percentiles were in commitment to otolaryngology, and the lowest were in commitment to academic medicine. USMLE steps 1 and 2 scores correlated most strongly with match potential. Total number of research experiences correlated most strongly with medical knowledge. There was no significant association between SLOR attributes and number of volunteer activities or work experiences, total number of awards, and number of awards earned before/during medical school. There were no significant SLOR attribute differences between applicants who took years off prior to or during medical school, or between applicants with and without additional graduate degrees. There was a significant difference between Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) and non-AOA members in medical knowledge, research, and commitment to otolaryngology. Limitations included a limited sample size and SLORs that came from a single institution.

Citation: Hu AC, Gu JT, Wong BJF. Objective measures and the standardized letter of recommendation in the otolaryngology residency match. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:603-608.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: medical residents, medical students, otolaryngologyIssue: March 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Letter from the Editor: How We Can Improve the Otolaryngology Residency Selection Process
  • New Initiatives Aim to Improve Residency Application, Program Evaluation
  • Letter from the Editor: Medicine’s March Madness
  • Reliance on Exam Scores in Residency Applicant Selection Restricts Diversity in Otolaryngology

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939