• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Lower Reimbursement, Greater Regulation Threaten to Shutter Sleep Centers

by Maybelle Cowan-Lincoln • August 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Testing Recommendation for Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing
  • Cost of Sleep Studies for U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Is High
  • Is Polysomnagraphy Required Prior to T+A for Diagnosis of OSA versus Mild Sleep Disordered Breathing in Children?
  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing
Explore This Issue
August 2013


Traditionally, nights in sleep centers are abuzz with activity. However, some of these nights are becoming quieter as sleep centers find it harder and harder to stay open in the wake of the twin storms of decreased reimbursement and increased regulation.

It will likely take a well-thought out, creative action plan that takes into account new third-party payer and regulatory climates to help sleep centers surive and—ultimately—thrive.

Where Did the Reimbursement Go?

Several factors affect reimbursement for sleep studies, the largest contributor to a sleep center’s revenue. The most significant change is the advent of the home sleep test (HST), which is replacing about 30 percent of in-lab polysomnography (PSG). Starting March 13, 2008, CMS published a National Coverage Determination to allow HST to diagnose sleep apnea and, as of Jan. 1, 2013, private insurers have followed that lead. The use of HSTs has grown dramatically, not surprising when HSTs are reimbursed at approximately 30 percent of in-lab studies. In fact, while CMS reimburses for both HST and PSG, many private insurers now require that sleep studies be done at home, except in cases with confounding comorbidities such as diabetes, congestive heart failure or hypertension. This change in reimbursement has caused a dramatic and sudden shift in the services performed by sleep centers.

James O’Brien, MD, a sleep medicine physician in private practice in Boston, projects that by year’s end, the number of full PSGs will be down by 50 percent, while the volume of HST will rise by 75 percent. This increase will be a function of the cost-effectiveness of HST, and also of its convenience. For patients, performing a test in the comfort of their own homes rather than in unfamiliar labs can make the testing more attractive, with a great deal less anxiety involved.

Many sleep centers, small and large, have already become casualties of this new marketplace. The precipitous drop in reimbursement has left them struggling to pay their staff, along with rents or mortgages. Additionally, the rise in HST has necessitated a shift in staffing. Centers that once staffed nocturnally for PSG now need a smaller night shift and must add a daytime shift to provide HST equipment and train patients in its use.

Primary Care Physicians

As the pool of reimbursement dollars shrinks, competition for a share is mounting. Insurers are beginning to contract with larger preferred service providers, leaving smaller operations out of the picture. Also, some diagnostic companies are working with primary care physicians (PCPs) to offer sleep studies through their offices. The physician prescribes an HST for a patient he or she believes suffers from sleep apnea, and the company arranges for the test and provides a sleep physician to interpret it. Reimbursement is then shared between the PCP and the diagnostic company.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: CMS, polysomnography, regulation, reimbursement, sleep centerIssue: August 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Testing Recommendation for Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing
  • Cost of Sleep Studies for U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Is High
  • Is Polysomnagraphy Required Prior to T+A for Diagnosis of OSA versus Mild Sleep Disordered Breathing in Children?
  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939