ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Lower Reimbursement, Greater Regulation Threaten to Shutter Sleep Centers

by Maybelle Cowan-Lincoln • August 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

This model of sleep testing raises many questions about the efficacy of the treatment offered through a PCP office. Who prescribes the CPAP machine for patients diagnosed with sleep apnea—the PCP or the interpreting physician? Who in the office has the necessary knowledge, experience and time to train patients diagnosed with sleep apnea on CPAP machines? Who troubleshoots for patients having equipment problems? What is the impact on compliance, already low for CPAP use, in cases where patients do not have access to a qualified sleep professional? Ultimately, the question is whether or not a PCP can treat sleep apnea effectively.

You Might Also Like

  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing
  • Cost of Sleep Studies for U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Is High
  • Swallowing Patterns Differ Between Healthy Subjects and Patients with Sleep Apnea
  • Sleep Apnea Associated with Hypertension in Young People
Explore This Issue
August 2013

An Australian study published in March of this year compared PCP management of sleep apnea to that of sleep centers (JAMA. 2013;309:997-1004). Re-

searchers concluded that patients treated by a PCP experienced outcomes relatively equivalent to those seen in sleep center patients. However, a closer look at the participating PCP offices revealed that their nurse practitioners had received intensive training in testing for and treating sleep disorders. In fact, one nurse had 20 years of experience in sleep medicine. Would typical PCP offices that do not employ staff with this level of expertise still be able to deliver results that approach those achieved in a sleep center?

“While the increased recognition of sleep dysfunciton is good, we cannot continue to incur more costs and increase availability of our services without more regulation.”

—Kathryn Hansen

The Burden of Increased Regulation

Another blow, new regulations, comes with a cost for compliance. There are three types of regulations affecting centers’ bottom lines:

  • Accreditation. Previously, sleep centers did not have to be accredited, but most states now require accreditation from either The Joint Commission or the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Accreditation will most likely be mandatory in all states within the year.
  • Credentialed staff. Professionals employed in sleep centers are now required to demonstrate competencies in diagnostics and treatments through exams, CE credits and peer review.
  • Proof of effectiveness. Centers must demonstrate that they are effective through patient compliance and improvement data.

Kathryn Hansen, executive director of the Kentucky Sleep Society and a sleep center management consultant, says that these changes should come as no surprise. The use of sleep testing has become almost epidemic as more and more physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants recognize the effects of sleep disorders on overall health. “While the increased recognition of sleep dysfunction is good,” she said, “we cannot continue to incur more costs and increase availability of our services without more regulation as we have seen in other specialties, including cardiology, pulmonology and home health care.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: CMS, polysomnography, regulation, reimbursement, sleep centerIssue: August 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing
  • Cost of Sleep Studies for U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Is High
  • Swallowing Patterns Differ Between Healthy Subjects and Patients with Sleep Apnea
  • Sleep Apnea Associated with Hypertension in Young People

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Podcasts Becoming More Popular Method of Education for Otolaryngologists
    • How to Embrace Optimism in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Tips on How to Approach Conversations with Patients about the COVID-19 Vaccine
    • Steps You Should Take to Protect Your Voice and Hearing During Telemedicine Sessions
    • Routine Postoperative Adjunct Treatments Unnecessary for Idiopathic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Polls

Have you spoken with your patients about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.