• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Lower Reimbursement, Greater Regulation Threaten to Shutter Sleep Centers

by Maybelle Cowan-Lincoln • August 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Testing Recommendation for Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing
  • Cost of Sleep Studies for U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Is High
  • Is Polysomnagraphy Required Prior to T+A for Diagnosis of OSA versus Mild Sleep Disordered Breathing in Children?
  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing
Explore This Issue
August 2013

click for large version

How to Take Charge of the Future of Sleep Centers

Navigating this new environment requires a dramatic overhaul of the way a sleep center operates. “Centers need to look at their practices and figure out how to be as efficient as they can as they adapt to the new environment of changing reimbursement and patient needs,” said Pell Ann Wardrop, MD, assistant professor of surgery in the division of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the University of Kentucky, medical director of the St. Joseph’s Sleep Wellness Center in Lexington and ENTtoday editorial board member. One key way to do this is to facilitate patient access and turnaround time. Have a CPAP technician available every day to see patients who come in for the results of their sleep study and train them on the use of their new equipment. This saves the time and money involved in scheduling an additional appointment to pick up the machine and learn how to operate it.

While streamlining operations, centers should also diversify their services and expand the diagnostic tests and clinical services available at the facility. Hansen suggests that practices incorporate dentists who specialize in treating sleep problems and psychology professionals who offer neurodiagnostic testing and behavioral treatment to attract more referrals and new patients.

Sleep medicine is an integral part of the overall management of many conditions, and this ubiquity provides numerous opportunities for referrals. But, in this new world, centers can no longer wait passively for new patients to materialize. They must take an active role in locating people who need their help.

Partnering with PCP offices is an excellent strategy to broaden a center’s patient base. PCPs can prescribe sleep studies for patients with conditions often accompanied by sleep apnea, including diabetes, arterial fibrillation and snoring. They can refer those at higher risk for sleep apnea, such as individuals who are overweight or who have large necks. Reaching out to PCP offices and reminding them of the value of a sleep study can improve the overall health of these patients, while establishing or increasing a physician’s referral network.

Electronic health records may become an important instrument for increasing PCP referrals. For centers attached to a network that includes a PCP office, EHRs make it easier to screen for patients with health histories that make them candidates for sleep studies and enable easy communication among all the professionals involved in the patients’ care. The depth of information they contain can reduce redundancies in diagnostic testing, providing significant cost savings. They can benefit centers not attached to a network by facilitating smooth and fast information transmission to home care or medical equipment companies. When EHRs are attached to a cloud network, their data can be collected to prove the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of treatment.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: CMS, polysomnography, regulation, reimbursement, sleep centerIssue: August 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Testing Recommendation for Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing
  • Cost of Sleep Studies for U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Is High
  • Is Polysomnagraphy Required Prior to T+A for Diagnosis of OSA versus Mild Sleep Disordered Breathing in Children?
  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939