• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Lower Reimbursement, Greater Regulation Threaten to Shutter Sleep Centers

by Maybelle Cowan-Lincoln • August 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

This model of sleep testing raises many questions about the efficacy of the treatment offered through a PCP office. Who prescribes the CPAP machine for patients diagnosed with sleep apnea—the PCP or the interpreting physician? Who in the office has the necessary knowledge, experience and time to train patients diagnosed with sleep apnea on CPAP machines? Who troubleshoots for patients having equipment problems? What is the impact on compliance, already low for CPAP use, in cases where patients do not have access to a qualified sleep professional? Ultimately, the question is whether or not a PCP can treat sleep apnea effectively.

You Might Also Like

  • Testing Recommendation for Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing
  • Cost of Sleep Studies for U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Is High
  • Is Polysomnagraphy Required Prior to T+A for Diagnosis of OSA versus Mild Sleep Disordered Breathing in Children?
  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing
Explore This Issue
August 2013

An Australian study published in March of this year compared PCP management of sleep apnea to that of sleep centers (JAMA. 2013;309:997-1004). Re-

searchers concluded that patients treated by a PCP experienced outcomes relatively equivalent to those seen in sleep center patients. However, a closer look at the participating PCP offices revealed that their nurse practitioners had received intensive training in testing for and treating sleep disorders. In fact, one nurse had 20 years of experience in sleep medicine. Would typical PCP offices that do not employ staff with this level of expertise still be able to deliver results that approach those achieved in a sleep center?

“While the increased recognition of sleep dysfunciton is good, we cannot continue to incur more costs and increase availability of our services without more regulation.”

—Kathryn Hansen

The Burden of Increased Regulation

Another blow, new regulations, comes with a cost for compliance. There are three types of regulations affecting centers’ bottom lines:

  • Accreditation. Previously, sleep centers did not have to be accredited, but most states now require accreditation from either The Joint Commission or the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Accreditation will most likely be mandatory in all states within the year.
  • Credentialed staff. Professionals employed in sleep centers are now required to demonstrate competencies in diagnostics and treatments through exams, CE credits and peer review.
  • Proof of effectiveness. Centers must demonstrate that they are effective through patient compliance and improvement data.

Kathryn Hansen, executive director of the Kentucky Sleep Society and a sleep center management consultant, says that these changes should come as no surprise. The use of sleep testing has become almost epidemic as more and more physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants recognize the effects of sleep disorders on overall health. “While the increased recognition of sleep dysfunction is good,” she said, “we cannot continue to incur more costs and increase availability of our services without more regulation as we have seen in other specialties, including cardiology, pulmonology and home health care.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: CMS, polysomnography, regulation, reimbursement, sleep centerIssue: August 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Testing Recommendation for Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing
  • Cost of Sleep Studies for U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Is High
  • Is Polysomnagraphy Required Prior to T+A for Diagnosis of OSA versus Mild Sleep Disordered Breathing in Children?
  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939