• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Making Up the Difference: Otolaryngologists find ways to provide care for under- and uninsured patients

by Jennifer L.W. Fink • January 13, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“We didn’t look specifically at insurance status, but given that this was a typical patient population at Cook County Hospital, the uninsured or underinsured rate was probably around 70 percent,” Dr. Patel said. “A much higher percentage came in with advanced-stage disease compared to what we’d expect as a nationwide norm.”

You Might Also Like

  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’
  • What the Affordable Care Act Means for Otolaryngologists and Their Patients
  • From Uninsured to Medicare Beneficiary-Who Suffers and Who Pays?
  • Is Caring for the Homeless and Uninsured Really Someone Else’s Problem?
Explore This Issue
January 2012

Other studies have examined the relationship between insurance coverage and asthma control. Uninsured children with asthma are much more likely to visit the emergency department for asthma attacks than their insured counterparts; they’re also less likely to have a usual source of health care (Pediatrics. 2006;117(2):486-496). Uninsured adults with asthma typically have lower peak flow rates than insured adults with asthma; they’re also less likely to be on inhaled steroids, despite the fact that the most recent asthma control initiatives from the National Institutes of Health state that “inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most potent and consistently effective long-term control medication for asthma” (J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(12): 905-913; NIH Publication No. 10-7541. April 2010).

Otolaryngologists who care for under- and uninsured patients also report having difficulty diagnosing patients in a timely fashion. Dr. Rima DeFatta knew that her patient with possible neurologic involvement needed medical imaging, but she has tried to balance her need for accurate medical knowledge with her patient’s limited ability to pay for testing. She worries that valuable treatment time may be lost in the process.

Best Care vs. Covered Care

While otolaryngology moves toward evidence-based medicine, insurance coverage doesn’t always meet those same standards.

“Most insurance company guidelines lag so far behind the most recent medical literature and consequently require that patients fail three or four different medications and jump through several steps before they’ll approve the drug of choice. Of course, it’s also about their bottom line when some outdated generic medication is on the preferred list,” Dr. Rima DeFatta said. She reports having frequent difficulty with anti-reflux medications, such as Nexium. “Reflux of larynx has a very different pathophysiology than reflux that affects only the esophagus and stomach. The insurance companies start to apply rules as to which medications and dosing they’ll pay for, but they’re completely inappropriate for the disease at hand,” she said. As a solution, Dr. Robert DeFatta has started to attach published research papers to preauthorization requests, which he says has brought him “some success.”

Tough Choices

When insurance coverage is inadequate, both patients and providers are forced to make tough choices. “It makes things more difficult when a second-line, more specialized antibiotic is the one of choice, but it’s not covered by the plan,” Dr. Patel said. “Then we either have to ask that patient to come up with the money to pay for it or choose an alternate choice that may not be what we think is ideal.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: healthcare reform, insurance, medical coverage, patient safety, policyIssue: January 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’
  • What the Affordable Care Act Means for Otolaryngologists and Their Patients
  • From Uninsured to Medicare Beneficiary-Who Suffers and Who Pays?
  • Is Caring for the Homeless and Uninsured Really Someone Else’s Problem?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939