• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Marketing Challenges and Opportunities in Otolaryngology: Unified Marketing Plan Yields Increase in Patient Load

by Gretchen Henkel • April 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Figure. Dr. Myles Pensak discusses the details of a patient's condition with her.

You Might Also Like

  • Private Practitioners Take Different Marketing Paths, with Common Theme
  • The Unified Airway: Do We Fully Appreciate Its Impact in Otolaryngology?
  • Quality Medical Care Forms Basis for All Marketing
  • Your Practice, Your Brand: Top 3 marketing strategies
Explore This Issue
April 2009
click for large version
Figure. Dr. Myles Pensak discusses the details of a patient’s condition with her.

Cleave to Core Mission

The Department of Otolaryngology has seen patients under different names and settings since the 1960s; University ENT was established as a practice in 1990 specializing in otolaryngology-head and neck conditions. The practice includes attending physicians, physician assistants, fellows, and residents, and also has a Voice and Swallowing Center, a Hearing and Balance Center, a Sinus and Allergy Center, and a growing Adult Airway Reconstruction Program.

All the practice’s marketing efforts revolve around the core mission: optimizing the care of patients. At University ENT, this core mission translates to myriad steps the clinicians and office staff practice continually. Dr. Pensak says that his practice has incorporated a hybrid version of the Ritz-Carlton or Nordstrom’s mindset: We recognize that, at times, having the surgery or seeing the doctor may not be the most important part of the patient’s visit. I’ve always maintained that some of the most important people are our front desk personnel. They’re the ones putting out the fires when we’re running late; they’re the ones that have to make the decision to fit in patients who are really ill. Dr. Pensak added that the practice never dismisses patient complaints without follow-up. Dissatisfied patients hear directly from the office manager or the physician involved, he said.

Personnel have been empowered to optimize the patient experience, and office-wide policies also underscore this emphasis. For instance, the office does not use a telephone routing service. When patients call, an office staff member answers. These staff members are equipped with multiple information sheets in order to answer patients’ questions. If the question is outside the office person’s bailiwick, he or she researches the question, finds the answer, and calls the patient back within a short time. The clinic’s office hours are designed to accommodate patients’ busy lives, with late afternoon, early evening, and Saturday office hours. University ENT also maintains a satellite clinic for patients who prefer to visit a smaller office.

Referral Relationships All-Important

Dr. Pensak and University ENT managing partner Allen Seiden, MD, are attentive to maintaining and building reciprocal referral relationships. They recognize that community-based physicians may sometimes be reluctant to refer patients to a university practice, and may fear that once patients have been seen for a specific problem, they will not be returned to their own practices. University ENT does not put itself in a competitive situation with area otolaryngologists in private practice. We are very fortunate to have a talented group of gifted general otolaryngologists in the Cincinnati area, Dr. Pensak pointed out. Many of these physicians trained at UofC. We rely on these guys to be supportive of the mission of the residency program in the academic department, and have been the beneficiaries of their referrals, he reported.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Practice Management Issue: April 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Private Practitioners Take Different Marketing Paths, with Common Theme
  • The Unified Airway: Do We Fully Appreciate Its Impact in Otolaryngology?
  • Quality Medical Care Forms Basis for All Marketing
  • Your Practice, Your Brand: Top 3 marketing strategies

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939