ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Medicare Sequester Set to Commence March 1

by Daphne Howland • February 26, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

In 2011, when Congress failed to make the so-called “grand bargain” budget agreement with the White House, it agreed to the Budget Control Act (BCA) to obliterate $1.2 trillion in federal spending over 2012 to 2021. In the absence of a traditional, negotiated budget passed by Congress and agreed to by the president, the law will apply blunt, across-the-board percentage cuts without much regard to policymaking. The bill uses “sequestration,” a compelling automatic decreases to most programs at different rates, each portion a separate sequester: 9.4 percent to discretionary military funding, 10 percent to mandatory defense funding, 8.2 percent to non-defense discretionary funding and 7.6 percent to non-defense mandatory funding, according to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the executive office that develops and manages budgets and other economic policies for the president. Originally slated to take hold in January, the BCA was postponed to March 1.

You Might Also Like

  • Medicare Physician Payment Cut Averted
  • Medicare Meltdown: Congress Seeks Payment Formula Fix
  • IPAB is Medicare’s New Hammer for Spending Accountability
  • Physician Groups Set 2011 Agenda: Medicare payment reform tops the list
Explore This Issue
February 2013

Medicare’s sequester inflicts a 2 percent annual cut, mostly to hospital and physician payments. For Medicare parts A and B, that’s $11 billion in year one, according to the OMB. The benefit structure would remain unchanged, and Part D low-income, Part D catastrophic subsidy and Qualified Individual premiums are exempt, according to a November 2011 Congressional Research Service report. For parts C and D, reductions would be made in monthly payments to the private plans that administer them. Reductions would be made at a uniform rate and are not to exceed 2 percent, the report said.

On February 5, President Obama urged Congress to void the indiscriminate cuts of the sequester and instead pass smaller cuts and some tax loophole reforms, moves the President said would be gentler on the economy. The $400 billion in Medicare savings he proposed during December’s fiscal cliff talks were still on the table, a package that includes provider payment reductions, premium hikes and new fees for wealthier beneficiaries.

Impact on Medical Providers and Patients

The Medicare sequester is relatively small, and Medicaid and Social Security are wholly exempt, thanks to lobbying by some members of Congress to protect vulnerable populations, said Rep. Jim McDermott, MD (D-Wash.), ranking member of the House Ways and Means Committee and a member of the House Budget Committee. Dr. McDermott believes Congress will indeed postpone the sequester past its March 1 deadline. “In many ways, providers are dodging the main bullet,” he said. “The real budget fight is going to happen between now and June or July. I have a feeling it’s not going to happen quickly, but it’s going to happen.”

Although talk of military spending is overshadowing Medicare in Washington, health care providers are imploring Congress to take note of the drag the cuts will have on the economy, their practices and their patients’ access to care. The Medicare reductions could lead to more than 750,000 lost jobs in the health care sector by 2021, endangering physician practices and patient access, according to a report released last September by the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Hospital Association and the American Nurses Association. Layoffs added to delays and freezes in hiring, capital projects and other investments would contribute to the losses, the report said.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Health Policy, News, Online Exclusives, Practice Management Tagged With: Medicare, policy, sequesterIssue: February 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Medicare Physician Payment Cut Averted
  • Medicare Meltdown: Congress Seeks Payment Formula Fix
  • IPAB is Medicare’s New Hammer for Spending Accountability
  • Physician Groups Set 2011 Agenda: Medicare payment reform tops the list

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Podcasts Becoming More Popular Method of Education for Otolaryngologists
    • How to Embrace Optimism in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Tips on How to Approach Conversations with Patients about the COVID-19 Vaccine
    • Steps You Should Take to Protect Your Voice and Hearing During Telemedicine Sessions
    • Routine Postoperative Adjunct Treatments Unnecessary for Idiopathic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Polls

Have you spoken with your patients about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.