• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Ménière’s Disease: A Diagnosis of Exclusion with Controversial Therapies

by Jennifer Decker Arevalo, MA • January 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Send Us Your Feedback We’d like to know what you think about our articles. Please feel free to respond to our stories by e-mailing ENToday@lwwny.com. When writing in, please include your full name, title, phone number, and e-mail address.

You Might Also Like

  • Ménière’s Disease-Don’t Blame the Patient
  • BPPV: State of the Art in Diagnosis And Treatment
  • Intratympanic Drug Therapy Effective for Ménière’s Disease
  • Salivary Gland Malignancies: Diagnosis and Treatment of a Rare and Challenging Cancer
Explore This Issue
January 2008

Almost 150 years ago, French physician Prosper Ménière first described the symptoms and probable cause of the inner ear disorder that bears his name. Unfortunately, despite decades of research, we’ve only made baby steps forward and Ménière’s still remains an idiopathic disease with controversial treatments and no cure, said Cliff Megerian, MD, Professor and Vice Chairman of Otolaryngology and Director of Otology and Neurotology at Case Western Reserve University Hospitals in Ohio.

With a prevalence rate of about 1,000 cases per 100,000 persons in the US population,1 this chronic disease typically starts between 20 and 50 years of age, increases in prevalence with age, affects men and women almost equally, and has unclear racial predispositions.2

Etiology

Since 1938, most otolaryngologists have recognized the causation of Ménière’s disease as endolymphatic hydrops, but this theory has now come into question, leaving the underlying cause(s) still unknown. Recent research indicates that Ménière’s disease probably has multiple etiologies, including autoimmune disorders, allergies, viruses, hereditary predisposition, and head injuries. The controversy is based on the fact that, upon autopsy, hydrops are not always found in persons with Ménière’s disease, yet they are commonly found in people who did not have Ménière’s type symptoms.3

Researchers are now looking less at hydrops and more specifically at the immunologic function of the endolymphatic sac, which is part of the immune system of the ear. Immune stimulation of the sac may disturb its fluid regulatory function or may cause hydrops to develop via independent mechanisms, such as the production of inflammatory mediators.4

Evidence also indicates that inhalant and food allergies may play a role in Ménière’s disease, causing dysfunction in the endolymphatic sac. Although more research is needed to substantiate that viruses are a possible cause, several investigators have found evidence of herpes simplex virus5,6 and varicella-zoster virus7 in the endolymphatic sac of patients with Ménière’s disease.

About one in three patients with Ménière’s disease has a first-degree relative with the disease; hereditary predisposition may be related to differences in anatomy of fluid channels within the ear or differences in immune response. Cases of post-traumatic Ménière’s disease are attributed to hydrodynamic changes caused by scarring from bleeding into the inner ear following a head injury or possibly ear surgery.4

Symptoms

Cliff Megerian, MDThe dilemma we face today is that once Ménière’s disease is diagnosed, we know how to control the vertigo, but we don’t know how to stop the decline in hearing. We need insight now as to the mechanism that causes hearing loss in this disease so that we can develop inhibitors of this process in the future.
-Cliff Megerian, MD

Patients with Ménière’s disease usually experience an attack characterized by a tetrad of symptoms: tinnitus, aural fullness in one ear, fluctuating hearing loss, and episodic rotational vertigo that leads to imbalance, severe nausea, vomiting, and sweating. During an attack, patients commonly have visual dependence and nystagmus.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, CT, debate, diagnosis, guidelines, hearing loss, meniere's, radiation, research, steroids, tinnitus, treatment, tumor, vertigoIssue: January 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Ménière’s Disease-Don’t Blame the Patient
  • BPPV: State of the Art in Diagnosis And Treatment
  • Intratympanic Drug Therapy Effective for Ménière’s Disease
  • Salivary Gland Malignancies: Diagnosis and Treatment of a Rare and Challenging Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939