ENTtoday
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
    • eNewsletters
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Metastatic Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Occult Head and Neck Primary: A ‘Conservative’ Approach

by Sue Pondrom • October 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

A conservative approach to treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma from unknown head and neck primary cancers compares favorably with results of other reported more aggressive protocols utilizing comprehensive irradiation or concurrent chemoradiation, according to study results reported by Rajan S. Patel, MBChB, MD, April 29 at the American Head and Neck Society’s program during the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meeting.

You might also like:

  • Computed Tomography Not Accurate Identifier for Extracapsular Spread in Cervical Lymph Node Metastases from Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • New Immunotherapy Improves Survival Rates in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Race Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • High-Resolution Microendoscopy Shows Promise for Intraoperative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Detection
Explore this issue:
October 2007

Representing the Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute in Australia, Dr. Patel told the audience that over the past 20 years, his facility had adopted a conservative approach with the intent of minimizing morbidity and reserving additional treatment for salvage. Treatment has been focused on the clinically involved neck only, by way of ipsilateral neck dissection and adjuvant postoperative neck irradiation in selected cases.

The optimal treatment of metastatic cervical squamous cell carcinoma arising from an unknown primary site [SCCUP] in the head and neck is unclear, Dr. Patel said. There is no real evidence that survival is greater with aggressive treatment.

Analysis of Protocol

The purpose of Dr. Patel’s study was to determine the efficacy of the treatment protocol followed at the Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, and to analyze recurrence and survival following treatment, with particular reference to patterns of treatment failure.

The 20-year retrospective study looked at 70 patients with SCCUP. Neck dissection alone was done in patients with pathological neck stage 1 (pN1) disease confined to the lymph node. All remaining patients received neck dissection and adjuvant postoperative irradiation of the involved, dissected neck. Indications for adjuvant postoperative neck irradiation included previous open biopsy, extracapsular spread (ECS), and advanced neck disease (pN2 or pN3).

Rajan S. Patel, MBChB, MD

Rajan S. Patel, MBChB, MD

Dr. Patel said that primary tumors subsequently emerged in eight patients, at a median of 18 months after neck dissection. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was planned for all of these patients according to the Sydney protocol, but two patients refused. Three patients had undergone negative biopsy of what ultimately proved to be the primary site. Salvage treatment was undertaken in six of the eight and included surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in four patients and surgery alone in two. Of the six patients who had salvage treatment, three are alive and disease-free, while three died. One patient died two months after treatment and the eighth patient was lost to follow-up.

Fourteen patients experienced cancer recurrence with a median time of nine months. Histology demonstrated ECS in all but one patient. Ipsilateral (dissected) neck failure occurred in nine patients who were rated pN2 or pN3. All these patients had received postoperative adjuvant neck irradiation.

Pages: 1 2 Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck Issue: October 2007

You might also like:

  • Computed Tomography Not Accurate Identifier for Extracapsular Spread in Cervical Lymph Node Metastases from Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • New Immunotherapy Improves Survival Rates in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Race Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • High-Resolution Microendoscopy Shows Promise for Intraoperative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Detection

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • How Writing Helps a Medical Resident Better Care for Patients
  • How Physicians Can Build a Network to Boost Their Career
  • How To Survive the First Year of Medical Residency
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours
  • Ethical Implications of Burnout in Otolaryngology Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Counseling Patients on Safe Nasal Irrigation
    • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Short-and Long-Term Data Suggest Efficacy of Turbinate Ablation
    • Counseling Patients on Safe Nasal Irrigation
    • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Otolaryngology
    • Letter from the Editor: Peer Reviewing Sensational Headlines
    • Is Topical Epinephrine Safe for Hemostasis in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery?
    • Is it Safe to Kiss in Era of HPV Head and Neck Cancer ‘Epidemic’?

Polls

Is artificial intelligence an advantage for medicine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Triological Meeting Posters

Wiley
© 2019 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.