• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

No Adverse Events from Monopolar Electrosurgery Use in Patients with Cochlear Implants

by Linda Kossoff • April 25, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the safety profile of monopolar electrosurgery (MES) in patients with cochlear implants (CIs)?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • No Evidence of CI Damage During Monopolar Cautery
  • Language Performance in Disabled Children with Cochlear Implants
  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • U.K. Surgeons Report Being Negatively Affected by Adverse Events
Explore This Issue
April 2023

No adverse events resulted from MES use in patients with CIs.

BACKGROUND: Monopolar electrosurgery is a versatile tool used to accomplish incision, dissection, or homeostasis during surgical procedures. Theoretically, MES use carries a risk of diversion of its electrosurgical current to existing implanted devices such as CIs; however, there is little reported evidence that substantiates CI device damage caused by MES.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series.

SETTING: Tertiary referral center.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers conducted a database search for patients who received CI surgery and other major surgeries between January 2009 and December 2021. They identified 35 patients who experienced 63 unique MES exposure events, with CI in vivo. Ten of the patients had bilateral CIs. Nine of the exposure events involved surgeries above the clavicle. The most common types of surgery included abdominal, thoracic/breast, spine, lower extremity orthopedic or vascular surgeries, and head and neck surgeries. Pre- and immediate postoperative speech recognition scores were not significantly different for patients using either consonant-nucleus-consonant or AzBio. Audiology and otolaryngology notes did not report any adverse events for any patient related to MES use. Overall findings showed that patients with CI are known to undergo surgery with MES, even in the head and neck, suggesting a lack of knowledge on contraindications to MES use in CI recipients.

CITATION: Cass ND, Lindquist NR, Bennett ML, et al. Monopolar electrosurgery with cochlear implants. Laryngoscope. 2023;133:933-937.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: clinical outcomesIssue: April 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • No Evidence of CI Damage During Monopolar Cautery
  • Language Performance in Disabled Children with Cochlear Implants
  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • U.K. Surgeons Report Being Negatively Affected by Adverse Events

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you served as an expert witness in a case that’s gone to trial?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
    • Composition and Priorities of Multidisciplinary Pediatric Thyroid Programs: A Consensus Statement
    • Artificial Intelligence as Author: Can Scientific Reviewers Recognize GPT- 4o–Generated Manuscripts?
    • Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item WETT
    • Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure May Increase Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis: Results from an Exposure-Matched Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939