• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment Covered at Sleep Meeting

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • August 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment Covered at Sleep Meeting

MINNEAPOLIS—Sleep professionals gathered here at SLEEP 2014, the 28th annual meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies LLC (APSS), held May 31–June 4, enjoyed more than 90 clinical and scientific sessions. The APSS is a joint venture of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and the Sleep Research Society.

You Might Also Like

  • Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation May Be Effective in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • How Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Is Evolving to Give Patients a Better Night’s Sleep
  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
  • Ansa Cervicalis Stimulation a Viable Ancillary Treatment for Some Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Explore This Issue
August 2014

Here are highlights from a few of the sessions.

Upper Airway Stimulation for Select Patients with OSA

In May of this year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a new device for a subset of patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are intolerant to the current first-line therapy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A panel of experts discussed the clinical data supporting approval of the device and provided some clinical perspective on its use in a select group of patients with OSA.

Upper Airway Stimulation Device. The first of its kind to receive FDA approval for the treatment of OSA in select patients, the upper airway stimulation device is an implantable system that senses breathing patterns and delivers a mild stimulation to the hypoglossal nerve to maintain airway patency during sleep. Developed and manufactured by Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (Maple Grove, Minn.), the device comprises a small generator, breathing sensor lead, and stimulation lead that are controlled with a handheld sleep remote.

According to Ryan J. Soose, MD, director of the division of sleep surgery and assistant professor in the department of otolaryngology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the device fills the need for new OSA treatment options, given the suboptimal adherence rates with CPAP and other oral devices, the lack of treatment options that target neuromuscular pathophysiology, and the morbidity and lack of high-quality data for many upper airway surgical procedures.

According to results from the Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction (STAR) trial published in January 2014, the device meets all three of these demands. The results paved the way for its approval by the FDA (N Engl J Med. 2014;370:139-149).

STAR trial results. In the prospective, multicenter, single-group, cohort study, 126 patients with moderate to severe OSA were surgically implanted with the upper airway stimulation device and followed for 12 months. All patients were 22 years of age or older, with moderate to severe OSA, a body mass index of <32, and intolerance to CPAP. All patients were required to be free of complete concentric pattern of retropalatal collapse on drug-induced sleep endoscopy.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: Obstructive sleep apnea, sleepIssue: August 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation May Be Effective in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • How Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Is Evolving to Give Patients a Better Night’s Sleep
  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
  • Ansa Cervicalis Stimulation a Viable Ancillary Treatment for Some Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939