• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Otolaryngologists Concerned about Online Consumer Hearing Test

by Geri Aston • March 6, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

United’s effort is “the equivalent of someone with vision loss doing an online vision test, making a diagnosis themselves and ordering their glasses,” Dr. Hillman said. “What if they had glaucoma? What if they had macular degeneration? What if they had diabetic retinopathy? The vision test may come out the same as someone with normal vision loss. There is a reason why people getting glasses are not able to do it online. The same should hold true for hearing aids.”

You Might Also Like

  • FDA Works to Increase Consumer Access to Hearing Aids
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About OTC Hearing Aids
  • Hearing Aid Update
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Working with Patients as Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Become Available
Explore This Issue
March 2012
Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: Hearing aids, hearing devices, hearing testsIssue: March 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • FDA Works to Increase Consumer Access to Hearing Aids
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About OTC Hearing Aids
  • Hearing Aid Update
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Working with Patients as Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Become Available

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939