• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Otolaryngologists Work to Heal Hearing Loss in U.S. Military Troops

by Jennifer L.W. Fink • January 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“Earning potential drops if you can’t communicate,” said Lt. Col. Mark Packer, MD, a neurotologist and director of the Department of Defense’s Hearing Center of Excellence. “So if you have a $30,000 drop in pay, that’s also $30,000 that’s not getting taxed. Hearing loss affects much more than just the individual and the individual’s family.”

You Might Also Like

  • Congress Mandates Better Reporting of Tinnitus Among United States Military
  • Ability to Heal from Hearing Damage Linked to Ear’s Circadian Rhythms
  • Musician Brains May Hold Answers to New Ways to Treat Hearing Loss
  • Considerable Gaps between Self-Reported Hearing Loss and Receiving Evaluation, Treatment
Explore This Issue
January 2013

Military physicians and safety officers are working in concert with civilian physicians, researchers and scientists to better protect troops’ hearing, and to restore hearing and quality of life post-service.

The Problem: Constant and Acute Noise Exposure

Military members experience unique auditory environments. While it’s not uncommon for civilians to work in chronically noisy environments, the duration and intensity of exposure is typically increased in military environments. “In the civilian sector, you have people working eight- to 10-hour days in fabrication, manufacturing and construction. Noise levels can be as high as 118 dBA,” Yankaskas said. “When you go to a military operation, the decibel level can be much higher, and it can be for 24 hours a day.”

Service members who work on ships or around airfields are chronically exposed to high levels of noise. But military members are also at risk for acute auditory insults. Active military operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan have increased the number of service members exposed to bombs, weapons fire and blasts, changing both the nature and mechanism of the auditory injury.

“Chronic noise exposure affects hearing within the sensory organ and cochlea; the hair cells are toxified by chronic exposure to loud noise,” Dr. Packer said. “Blast injuries can be much more traumatic. The peak pressures in the ear rise much more quickly, so the impact on the hearing system is not chronic and insidious but explosive. Some of the injuries we see from blasts not only show sensory hearing loss but also brain injury, tympanic perforation and disruption of the ossicular chain. The blast may also create flying debris, so there are secondary blunt impacts and trauma. And if you’re close enough, severe heat injuries and burns can also happen at the same time.”

Often, hearing is a secondary consideration; when a solider is injured, preference is always given to life-threatening injuries, and hearing injuries are often invisible. Some resolve quickly, for reasons physicians don’t quite understand. “Some patients who come in with complaints of hearing loss and tinnitus following an acoustic or blast-related injury will have subjective improvement fairly rapidly, but most patients do not. In the theater, audiometric testing is usually not available,” said Lt. Col. Mitchell Ramsey, MD, an otolaryngologist who served in Afghanistan. “Many factors contribute to presence or absence of recovery, including the blast intensity, innate inner ear tolerance to injury, co-existing conditions, prior trauma and probably many others, all of which need to be further researched.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: hearing loss, military, tinnitusIssue: January 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Congress Mandates Better Reporting of Tinnitus Among United States Military
  • Ability to Heal from Hearing Damage Linked to Ear’s Circadian Rhythms
  • Musician Brains May Hold Answers to New Ways to Treat Hearing Loss
  • Considerable Gaps between Self-Reported Hearing Loss and Receiving Evaluation, Treatment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939