• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Outpatient and Minimally Invasive Approaches Or Safe and Effective Options for Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

by Amy Rothman Schonfeld, PhD • February 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy also carries no risk of postoperative permanent hypoparathyroidism, or adynamic bone disease. This advantage is due to the improved preoperative localization with imaging, allowing identification and removal of the single adenoma, leaving the other three normal parathyroid glands nondisturbed, intact and functioning.

You Might Also Like

  • Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy Not Inferior to Conventional Surgery
  • Probe-Based System Effective in Recognizing Parathyroid Glands During Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism
  • Comparing Options for Minimally Invasive Rhinoplasty
  • A Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy
Explore This Issue
February 2007

Outpatient thyroidectomy and minimally invasive parathyroidectomy also carry an additional benefit: cost savings. In Dr. Terris’s study, costs were significantly lower for outpatients ($7,974) than for inpatients ($9,578, p = 0.0006). Although reduced costs are not a compelling reason for surgeons to consider alternatives to traditional patient management, the comparable efficacy findings, improved safety outcomes, and desirable patient benefits demonstrated by these two studies should encourage surgeons to consider minimally invasive and/or outpatient surgery for selected patients with thyroid and parathyroid disease.

©2007 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: February 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy Not Inferior to Conventional Surgery
  • Probe-Based System Effective in Recognizing Parathyroid Glands During Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism
  • Comparing Options for Minimally Invasive Rhinoplasty
  • A Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939