• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in the Practice Setting: Part 2: Setting Up an Outcomes Assessment Program in Your Practice

by Maureen Hannley, PhD • April 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Once you have selected the topic of your question and focused it with a research question, decided on the numbers of patients that you need, selected an outcomes instrument, set the time parameters of your study, and appointed a project coordinator, you should consider and formalize the logistics of the study so that it will interfere as little as possible with normal office routine. This would include:

You Might Also Like

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in the Practice Setting
  • Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Are Patient-Reported Voice Outcomes Better after Surgery or after Radiation for Treatment of T1 Glottic Carcinoma?
  • New Computer Program May Help Predict Outcomes of Cochlear Implants in Children
Explore This Issue
April 2008
  • When will the data be collected (before and after a treatment, prior to an encounter)?
  • How often will be data be collected (every office visit, every three months, once a year)?
  • Where will the data be collected (in the office, sent out by mail or e-mailed)?
  • Who will analyze the data collected from the patient questionnaires (the physician, the project coordinator, etc.)?3

Any time data are collected from or about patients for research purposes, they must give informed consent to participate in that research and the investigator must obtain institutional review board (IRB) consent for the research. All procedures and consent forms must adhere to HIPAA privacy regulations. If you are not affiliated with a university, IRB review can be obtained through a hospital or an independent board such as the Western IRB (WIRB). For a superb reference, including sample patient consent forms and procedures for IRB applications, see Stone’s Conducting Clinical Research.4 It is a refreshingly pragmatic handbook/guide to every step of the process by an experienced physician researcher.

Conducting the Study

Once collected, the data should be entered to a database for easy analysis. The most familiar and commonly available is Excel™, although others such as Access™ and Paradox™ or others could be used, depending on the investigator’s preference. Data must be checked periodically for accuracy, completeness, and logic-if possible, the database should be programmed to check for values that are missing, out of the measurement range (e.g., entering 100, for an actual range of 1-10), or illogical.

Be sure to check the clinic schedule periodically to assure that all eligible patients have been included in the project. Providing office personnel with a laminated, pocket-size card printed with eligibility criteria may help. A good eye for quality control is essential to ensure the integrity of the data set.

Data Analysis

Most database programs have the ability to conduct simple analyses of the data: means, medians, standard deviations, simple t-tests, correlations, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data analysis may be aggregate or patient-specific, and you would need to consider whether the data are normally distributed before determining which statistical treatment would be appropriate.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: outcomes, patient communication, patient education, practice management, Quality, researchIssue: April 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in the Practice Setting
  • Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Are Patient-Reported Voice Outcomes Better after Surgery or after Radiation for Treatment of T1 Glottic Carcinoma?
  • New Computer Program May Help Predict Outcomes of Cochlear Implants in Children

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939