• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in the Practice Setting

by Maureen Hannley, PhD • January 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Bilateral dissections were performed on 61 cadavers that had no evidence of previous nasal trauma or sinonasal surgery. The investigators examined the ethmoidal crest of the perpendicular plate of the palatine bone; the location of the SPF, and the presence and location of the accessory foramen; distance from the SPF and accessory foramen to the anterior nasal spine; and the number of arterial branches emerging through the SPF and through the accessory foramen.

You Might Also Like

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in the Practice Setting: Part 2: Setting Up an Outcomes Assessment Program in Your Practice
  • Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Are Patient-Reported Voice Outcomes Better after Surgery or after Radiation for Treatment of T1 Glottic Carcinoma?
  • Quality Over Quantity: Accountable care organizations link physician payments to hospital outcomes
Explore This Issue
January 2008

The researchers found that the ethmoidal crest was present in all cases; it was anterior to the SPF in 98.4% of cases. The most frequent (86.9%) location of the SPF was the transition area between the middle and superior meatus. The accessory foramen was present in only 9.83% of cases; in all but one of these, it was located within the middle meatus. The average distance from the SPF to the anterior nasal spine was 6.6 cm, and the average distance from the accessory foramen to the anterior nasal spine was 6.7 cm. Most nasal fossae (67.21%) presented only a single trunk, emerging through the SPF. In all cases, the accessory foramen presented only one branch. The researchers found no significant association of any variable with the presence of the accessory foramen.

The investigators note that the ethmoid crest, present in all cases, is an important anatomical landmark to find the SPF. Although trying to predict when an accessory foramen would be present could be of great value to minimize therapeutic failure, the prediction of its presence was not possible in relation to the variables analyzed in this study.

(Laryngoscope 2008;118:156-61)

©2008 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management Tagged With: healthcare reform, outcomes, patient communication, patient satisfaction, policy, polysomnography, Quality, research, sleep-disordered breathing, survey, treatmentsIssue: January 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in the Practice Setting: Part 2: Setting Up an Outcomes Assessment Program in Your Practice
  • Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Are Patient-Reported Voice Outcomes Better after Surgery or after Radiation for Treatment of T1 Glottic Carcinoma?
  • Quality Over Quantity: Accountable care organizations link physician payments to hospital outcomes

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939