• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Poor Ergonomics During Surgery Increase Musculoskeletal Injury Risk

by Literature Review • February 6, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What ergonomic challenges in postural-related strain and musculoskeletal discomfort exist among otolaryngology surgeons, and what ergonomics training and equipment are available to them?

Bottom Line
Pain and disability induced by poor ergonomics are widespread among the otolaryngology community, and surgeons rarely receive ergonomic training in the surgical context. The majority of observed surgeons displayed poor posture, particularly a poor cervical angle and use of ergonomic setups, both of which increase ergonomic risk hazard.

You Might Also Like

  • Better Positioning During Microlaryngeal Surgery May Help Prevent Surgeon Injury
  • How Surgical Ergonomics Impact Surgeon Wellbeing, Outcomes, and Careers
  • Varices Increase Hemorrhage Risk in Vocal Fold Patients; Overall Risk Low
  • NSAIDs Do Not Increase Post-Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage Risk
Explore This Issue
February 2019

Background: On average, surgeons spend approximately 2,500 hours working per year, with up to a third of those hours spent in the OR. This activity level can take a toll on the surgeons’ musculoskeletal (MSK) system, particularly as a result of prolonged poorly compensated postural load and absences of good ergonomic practice in the OR. Globally, between 47% to 74% of responding otolaryngology surgeons report some degree of pain or discomfort directly attributed to poor ergonomic positioning during work.

Study design: Intraoperative observations and survey study of 70 otolaryngology surgeons, including attending staff, fellows, and residents.

Setting: Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, Calif.

Synopsis: The response rate was 68.6% (48 of 70). A total of 35 respondents reported significant discomfort during surgery. Over half of respondents assumed a standing position during surgery, especially during open surgical technique. No respondents assumed a standing position during microscopic surgery; endoscopic procedures were done both standing or seated. The most common area of MSK discomfort was in the cervical spine, both standing and seated. Limb pain was similar in both seated and standing positions. Thirteen respondents reported no pain. Standing during surgery was most associated with back pain, and was significantly associated with cervical pain. Other activities contributing to back pain were sitting during surgery, and sitting and standing in the clinic. Most respondents experienced pain during work either less than once per week or less than two times per week. The average back pain severity during surgery or in the clinic was 2.2 of 10; the peak average back pain severity was 3.3 of 10. Approximately half of respondents stated that MSK pain did not affect their work; 14 reported a mild effect. Fifteen respondents were mildly affected and 10 were moderately affected by MSK pain outside of work. Of those, 21 of 45 respondents reported access to adjustable surgical chair/stools with armrests. Using Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) on surgical photos, eight scores for standing surgery were at high risk of injury, 15 were at medium risk, and four were at low risk. In the seated group, none were at high risk, eight were at medium risk, and three were at low risk. For standing surgery, the greatest REBA risk factor was inappropriate table height. Others included awkward postures, excessive repetition, use of excessive force, static exertions, and vibration. Limitations included the small sample size from a single institution, the subjective nature of REBA scoring, and lack of information on predisposing injury factors.

Citation: Vaisbuch Y, Aaron KA, Moore JM, et al. Ergonomic hazards in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2019;129:370–376.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews Tagged With: ergonomics, surgeryIssue: February 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Better Positioning During Microlaryngeal Surgery May Help Prevent Surgeon Injury
  • How Surgical Ergonomics Impact Surgeon Wellbeing, Outcomes, and Careers
  • Varices Increase Hemorrhage Risk in Vocal Fold Patients; Overall Risk Low
  • NSAIDs Do Not Increase Post-Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage Risk

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939