• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Proposed Legislation Could Speed Up Audit Process, Increase Transparency

by Richard Quinn • January 12, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Richard Quinn is a freelance medical writer based in New Jersey.

You Might Also Like

  • Avoid the Hot Seat: How to prepare for a CMS audit
  • Audit Agony: Prepare yourself as insurers look to recoup funds
  • OTC Hearing Aid Legislation Offers Accessibility, But Raises Concerns
  • Medicare Reform Legislation Repeals SGR, Consolidates Incentive Programs
Explore This Issue
January 2016

AFIRMing the Details

The Audit and Appeal Fairness, Integrity, and Reforms in Medicare (AFIRM) Act of 2015 would speed up the recovery audit (RA) appeal process—formerly known as the recovery audit contractor (RAC) initiative. Specifics of the proposal include:

  • Adding Medicare magistrates who could handle certain appeals, easing the backlog on judges;
  • Adding a new CMS ombudsman to further speed the process;
  • Increasing the current amount in controversy threshold from $150 in fiscal year 2015 to “be raised to a threshold equal to the amount in controversy as required for Medicare appealed claims to be heard at the federal court level”;
  • Allowing decisions to be rendered without a hearing in cases where no material disputes exist; and
  • Shortening look-back periods to no more than six months after the date of service in cases where claims are submitted within three months of care delivery.

Source: RACmonitor

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: audit process, CMS, legislation, MedicareIssue: January 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Avoid the Hot Seat: How to prepare for a CMS audit
  • Audit Agony: Prepare yourself as insurers look to recoup funds
  • OTC Hearing Aid Legislation Offers Accessibility, But Raises Concerns
  • Medicare Reform Legislation Repeals SGR, Consolidates Incentive Programs

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you experienced an increase in in-office rhinology procedures in the last year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Questions on NIH Funding Leave ENT Researchers Pondering Next Steps and Leaving Everything Up in the Air
    • In-Office Rhinology Practices Continue to Grow
    • How Do We Define “Winning” in the OR?
    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
    • How To: Superior Maximization of Sphenoidotomy with Olfaction Preservation in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939