• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Quality Improvement: We Are Not Alone

by Robert H. Miller, MD, MBA • December 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Robert H Miller, MD, MBA, is Executive Director of the American Board of Otolaryngology and Chair of the Editorial Board of ENT Today.

You Might Also Like

  • Get Ready for Quality Improvement: Panelists outline helpful metrics and more
  • New Quality Indicator: MOC promotes better care, ABOto director says
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • Canal Wall Up vs. Canal Wall Down: Symptom of a greater need?
Explore This Issue
December 2008

This issue’s Special Report is on quality improvement, an increasingly important health care issue not only in this country, but also in many other countries around the world. I don’t think anyone can argue with the fact that the US health care system is, overall, more advanced in technology, capabilities, and capacity than that of any other country in the world, a fact of which we American physicians should be very proud. However, there is always room for improvement.

I think sometimes physicians are overly sensitive to the media reports about thousands of patients dying each year because of medical errors, because they take it personally. Physicians feel very strongly about their patients’ well-being and we view ourselves as the captains of the ship, so when we hear reports of these medical misadventures, we inherently feel challenged or threatened. We may think our practices are being criticized unfairly when we are doing our best in what are difficult times. This reaction is both a good thing and a bad thing.

Let’s start with the bad thing. If we feel personally attacked, then we may assume a defensive posture because not only are the malpractice lawyers saying we are the villains, but now the health care quality improvement experts are against us, too. Taking this attitude is, in some ways, only natural, but it is incorrect and nonproductive. We could become insular and not be an active participant in the improvement process. Or worse, we could reflexively fight needed changes because they might interfere with what is the usual practice to which we have become accustomed.

It is one thing to say 'let's not do this again,' but another thing entirely to look systematically into how the mistake occurred and change procedures to ensure it does not happen again.It is one thing to say ‘let’s not do this again,’ but another thing entirely to look systematically into how the mistake occurred and change procedures to ensure it does not happen again.

The Right Response

I think the appropriate response (the good thing) is that we do care about our patients; we should ask How can we, as a part of the health care team, improve the system?

At one level, we can work within our offices and hospitals, reviewing systems and processes for areas of improvement. Most of the fatal errors identified in various reports are not physician-based, but result from problems with the systems in place in our hospitals and offices. Medication errors (incorrect transcription of an order, errors in administered dosage, drug interactions) are among the most frequently cited causes of problems in hospitals.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management, Viewpoint Tagged With: healthcare reform, maintenance of certification, medical errors, policy, Quality, viewpointIssue: December 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Get Ready for Quality Improvement: Panelists outline helpful metrics and more
  • New Quality Indicator: MOC promotes better care, ABOto director says
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • Canal Wall Up vs. Canal Wall Down: Symptom of a greater need?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939