ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Quality Improvement: We Are Not Alone

by Robert H. Miller, MD, MBA • December 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Robert H Miller, MD, MBA, is Executive Director of the American Board of Otolaryngology and Chair of the Editorial Board of ENT Today.

You Might Also Like

  • Get Ready for Quality Improvement: Panelists outline helpful metrics and more
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • New Quality Indicator: MOC promotes better care, ABOto director says
  • Canal Wall Up vs. Canal Wall Down: Symptom of a greater need?
Explore This Issue
December 2008

This issue’s Special Report is on quality improvement, an increasingly important health care issue not only in this country, but also in many other countries around the world. I don’t think anyone can argue with the fact that the US health care system is, overall, more advanced in technology, capabilities, and capacity than that of any other country in the world, a fact of which we American physicians should be very proud. However, there is always room for improvement.

I think sometimes physicians are overly sensitive to the media reports about thousands of patients dying each year because of medical errors, because they take it personally. Physicians feel very strongly about their patients’ well-being and we view ourselves as the captains of the ship, so when we hear reports of these medical misadventures, we inherently feel challenged or threatened. We may think our practices are being criticized unfairly when we are doing our best in what are difficult times. This reaction is both a good thing and a bad thing.

Let’s start with the bad thing. If we feel personally attacked, then we may assume a defensive posture because not only are the malpractice lawyers saying we are the villains, but now the health care quality improvement experts are against us, too. Taking this attitude is, in some ways, only natural, but it is incorrect and nonproductive. We could become insular and not be an active participant in the improvement process. Or worse, we could reflexively fight needed changes because they might interfere with what is the usual practice to which we have become accustomed.

It is one thing to say 'let's not do this again,' but another thing entirely to look systematically into how the mistake occurred and change procedures to ensure it does not happen again.It is one thing to say ‘let’s not do this again,’ but another thing entirely to look systematically into how the mistake occurred and change procedures to ensure it does not happen again.

The Right Response

I think the appropriate response (the good thing) is that we do care about our patients; we should ask How can we, as a part of the health care team, improve the system?

At one level, we can work within our offices and hospitals, reviewing systems and processes for areas of improvement. Most of the fatal errors identified in various reports are not physician-based, but result from problems with the systems in place in our hospitals and offices. Medication errors (incorrect transcription of an order, errors in administered dosage, drug interactions) are among the most frequently cited causes of problems in hospitals.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management, Viewpoint Tagged With: healthcare reform, maintenance of certification, medical errors, policy, Quality, viewpointIssue: December 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Get Ready for Quality Improvement: Panelists outline helpful metrics and more
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • New Quality Indicator: MOC promotes better care, ABOto director says
  • Canal Wall Up vs. Canal Wall Down: Symptom of a greater need?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Why Virtual Grand Rounds May Be Here to Stay
    • Otolaryngologist Leverages His Love of Pinball into Second Business
    • These New Imaging Advances May Help to Protect Parathyroids
    • Is the Training and Cost of a Fellowship Worth It? Here’s What Otolaryngologists Say
    • Which Otologic Procedures Poses the Greatest Risk of Aerosol Generation?

Polls

Have you used 3D-printed materials in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.