• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

by John Austin • August 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CHICAGO-Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is considered one of the most complex and difficult-to-diagnose manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although it has been estimated that LPR is present in up to 50% of patients with voice disorders, there have been no validated instruments for quantifying the physical symptoms and severity of LPR.

You Might Also Like

  • No Significant Association Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Gaining Recognition as Distinct Disorder, Paving the Way for Research and Treatment
  • Diet Therapy an Effective Alternative to Medication in Some Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
  • Voice Therapy Improves Reflux Symptoms in Patients with Voice Complaints
Explore This Issue
August 2006

Much effort has been spent over the past few years in developing such instruments, said Tamer A. Mesallam, MD, MSc, of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (Ohio). Two instruments-Reflux Finding Score (RFS) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI)-are commonly used as assessment tools in diagnosing and treating LPR.

Dr. Mesallam presented a paper comparing these two measurement tools at a session hosted by the American Broncho-Esophageal Association (ABEA) here at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings (COSM).

Quantifying LPR

Table. Reflux Finding Score

click for large version
Table. Reflux Finding Score

The most commonly recognized signs and symptoms of LPR include hoarseness, vocal fatigue, excessive throat clearing, globus pharyngeus, chronic cough, postnasal drip, and dysphagia. Treatment options available to LPR patients include diet and behavior modification, antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors, and fundoplication surgery. Determining the appropriateness of these potential therapies, however, is dependent on the physician’s ability to accurately quantify the associated treatment outcomes.

RFS is an eight-item index designed to assess clinical severity based on laryngoscopic findings. Scores range from 0 (normal) to 26 (most severe), with a score of 11 or above generally considered to be indicative of LPR. The eight items included in the scale are subglottic edema, ventricular obliteration, erythema/hyperemia, vocal fold edema, diffuse laryngeal edema, posterior commissure hypertrophy, granuloma/granulation tissue, and excessive endolaryngeal mucus (see Reflux Finding Score, left).

The RSI is a nine-item self-administered outcome questionnaire designed to document LPR symptoms and severity. Patients are asked to rate how nine problems have affected them over the past month on a scale of 0 (no problem) to 5 (severe problem), with a maximum total score of 45. A total score of more than 13 is considered positive as far as diagnosis of LPR (see Reflux Symptom Index, above).

Table. Reflux Symptom Index

click for large version
Table. Reflux Symptom Index

While both RFS and RSI have been shown to be effective, the correlation between these two instruments has not been much studied, said Dr. Mesallam. The objective of our study was to determine the relation between RSI and RFS regarding total score.

Study Protocols

Forty randomly selected patients-14 males and 26 females between the ages of 17 and 60-were included in the study. A retrospective chart review was performed for those patients fitting the inclusion criteria to choose those with RSI suggestive of LPR. For RFS, the video stroboscopic samples for the study group were reviewed and rated by six experienced raters on two different occasions to evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability. The RSI and RFS were statistically compared with regard to both the total scores and the individual parameters.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: COSM, diagnosis, outcomes, reflux, research, treatmentIssue: August 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • No Significant Association Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Gaining Recognition as Distinct Disorder, Paving the Way for Research and Treatment
  • Diet Therapy an Effective Alternative to Medication in Some Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
  • Voice Therapy Improves Reflux Symptoms in Patients with Voice Complaints

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939