• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis Carries High Productivity Cost

by Amy Eckner • September 7, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Clinical Question

How much is lost in annual productivity costs for a patient with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (RCRS), and what is the relationship between productivity costs and RCRS-specific characteristics?

You Might Also Like

  • Depression Primary Driver of Lost Productivity in Patients with CRS
  • Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Medical and Treatment Options
  • Younger Age, Conscientiousness Rate Associated with Activity Avoidance in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis Symptom Duration Does Not Affect ESS Outcomes
Explore This Issue
September 2014

Background: Patients with RCRS suffer several negative health consequences, including reduced quality of life, poor sleep, and increased body pain. These effects can lead to work absences, reduced work performance, and lost leisure household time. Accurate disease-specific costs must include direct and indirect costs for a societal perspective. The relationship between CRS-specific characteristics and degree of productivity costs must also be evaluated.

Study design: Prospective, multi-institutional, observational cohort study.

Setting: Patients were enrolled at four tertiary level rhinology clinics: Medical University of South Carolina, University of Calgary, Stanford University, and Oregon Health and Science University.

Synopsis: A total of 55 RCRS patients were enrolled. Lost productive time (LPT) was defined as the per-person workdays lost due to RCRS. Household productivity loss was calculated by time per day used at home to care for sinuses. Comorbid characteristics included nasal polyps and asthma. The mean annual absenteeism LPT was 24.6 days per patient; LPT when patients were present was 38.8 workdays per patient. The overall annual LPT from both was 63.4 paid workdays missed per patient. Patients reported a mean of 29 minutes per day caring for their sinus disease, with a mean of 21.2 household days lost per year. Productivity costs related to paid work LPT were $8,150.07 per year, and those related to household LPT were $1,927 per year. There was no association between RCRS with or without polyposis and CRS with or without asthma. There was a significant correlation between productivity cost and degree of disease-specific quality-of-life impairment, and between age and productivity costs. Limitations included the small number of patients, a small cohort of the overall CRS population, and a potential risk of recall bias.

Bottom line: The annual productivity cost associated with RCRS is $10,077.07 per patient, providing a strong incentive to optimize treatment protocols.

Citation: Rudmik L, Smith TL, Schlosser RJ, Hwang PH, Mace JC, Soler ZM. Productivity costs in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:2007-2012.

—Reviewed by Amy Eckner

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: CRS, rhinosinusitisIssue: September 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Depression Primary Driver of Lost Productivity in Patients with CRS
  • Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Medical and Treatment Options
  • Younger Age, Conscientiousness Rate Associated with Activity Avoidance in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis Symptom Duration Does Not Affect ESS Outcomes

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939