• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Situation Critical: Otolaryngologists See Diminishing Returns for Taking Emergency Call

by Gretchen Henkel • June 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“Hospitals will have to decide, if they’re going to provide ER service, that they have to pay a per diem for the people to do that,” Dr. Davison said. “And that per diem ought to be a flat fee that you receive just to carry the pager. Just to be inconvenienced in your life, that number, to my mind, needs to be between $1200 and $2000 a day per physician.”

You Might Also Like

  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • Borrowing 101: Minimize risk when taking out a loan for your practice
Explore This Issue
June 2006

The solution for many otolaryngologists—head and neck surgeons is simply to stop taking call.

Dr. Davison also has strong feelings about the divisions within specialties. Physicians have become divided, he said, into two camps: “the grandfathered camp and the new graduate camp. The grandfathered camp frequently used the model of developing a practice from the ER. But they have sold out the new camp, saying —anybody who had privileges at the hospital prior to 1986 doesn’t have to take call and everybody who starts now has to take call.’ The burden of covering often goes to the more junior physicians. If we decide as a society, either plastic surgeons or ENTs, that we have a moral obligation to cover the ER, then everybody should have to cover, and take an equal share.”

Searching for Solutions

Like many others who have studied the current status of ER coverage, Dr. Davison knows this “is not an easy problem. The hospital has got an unfunded mandate too. So it’s not really fair. They’re not the bad guys, but it is more in their best interests, and not in the physician’s best interests [to cover call].”

A May 2005 American College of Emergency Physicians Information Paper, “Availability of On-Call Specialists,” proposes a variety of legislative, regulatory, and purchasing agreement solutions to mitigate the on-call crisis. Dr. Vanlandingham believes that one of the suggested approaches, outlining creation of group purchasing organizations by hospitals, might be one possible solution. The group purchasing organizations could request proposals from contracted groups of physicians to fill call panels. This approach might be particularly helpful in rural areas, where a group of otolaryngologists could contract to cover several hospitals in a county-wide region. “It’s a burden to the otolaryngologist on-call at another hospital two miles from mine to take care of all of our ENT transferred patients when the hospital is not chipping in to help compensate for on-call coverage,” he conceded.

Dr. Donaldson suggested that solutions particular to Florida must be three-pronged: tort reform to address the liability issue; pressure at the public policy level to raise reimbursement levels; and providing an adequate supply of specialists graduating from programs. Physicians must act in concert to effect change in federal reimbursement formulas, he believes. The Florida Pediatric Society recently filed a suit against Medicaid in federal court, charging that the low Medicaid reimbursement rates (65% of the already low Medicare rates) constitute a denial of access to care for the state’s low-income children. Actions similar to these may alleviate some of the stresses on the country’s delivery of emergency room care, but the situation is unlikely to improve anytime soon, say many who study the issues.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: cost, emergency, EMTALA, healthcare reform, insurance, legal, malpractice, Medicare, policy, reimbursementIssue: June 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • Borrowing 101: Minimize risk when taking out a loan for your practice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939