• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Situation Critical: Otolaryngologists See Diminishing Returns for Taking Emergency Call

by Gretchen Henkel • June 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What Dr. Vanlandingham finds frustrating is when an otolaryngologist refuses to take call about an urgent situation, such as a patient with a posterior nosebleed. He must then transfer that patient to another hospital’s emergency room, where the patient may often wait another three to four hours for the specialist to be called. “Besides the inefficiencies, my main concern is patient safety,” he said. “As an emergency physician, I wish on some nights that taking call were a mandatory part of licensure for all specialists, but then, of course there would be other problems associated with that solution.”

You Might Also Like

  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • Borrowing 101: Minimize risk when taking out a loan for your practice
Explore This Issue
June 2006

Variances among Regions

Although EMTALA is a federal statute, its consequences are felt in widely different ways according to state and local economics. For instance, in California, mandated (and also unfunded) seismic retrofitting weighs heavily on hospital budgets. In Florida, said Dr. Donaldson, hospitals cannot, by state law, opt out of providing emergency services—and yet, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates are low.

“The first issue I see in San Luis Obispo County,” said Candy Markwith, CEO of Sierra Vista Regional Medical Center, a Tenet Healthcare–owned hospital in San Luis Obispo, Calif., “is the lack of physicians in general. Being on rural reimbursement rates,” she said, “presents a challenge to us in our ability to recruit physicians to our area.” That challenge is exacerbated in a locale with high housing prices (the county is a central California tourist destination), and by the fact that physicians coming out of school have very large student loans—with choices of employment all across the country. “In a county our size [total population, approximately 300,000], with four hospitals, it is very difficult for some of the subspecialists to be available 24 hours, all the time,” she said.

A Path to Solutions?

Suggestions about solutions to the on-call coverage crisis often align with the stakeholder group suggesting them. Hospitals would like to see more funding; physicians would like to see more and higher stipends; and patients want to ensure that they will receive appropriate care in emergencies.

Dr. Harris believes that hospitals’ difficulties in maintaining call panels to comply with EMTALA are a direct result of the industry’s own actions. Dr. Harris noted that prior to the mid 1980s, “a covert contract was in place between the hospital and the medical staff. In return for complying with the written portion of the contract requiring physicians to cover the emergency room, the hospital honored the unwritten portion: physicians’ access to the prime arena for networking with referral sources and building a practice.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: cost, emergency, EMTALA, healthcare reform, insurance, legal, malpractice, Medicare, policy, reimbursementIssue: June 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • Borrowing 101: Minimize risk when taking out a loan for your practice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939