• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Situation Critical: Otolaryngologists See Diminishing Returns for Taking Emergency Call

by Gretchen Henkel • June 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Mary Talley Bowden, MD, an otolaryngologist–head and neck surgeon at Memorial Northwest Otolaryngology, a practice affiliated with Memorial Hermann Northwest Hospital in Houston, Tex., said her group has taken themselves off the ER call schedule. Their reasons were similar to those revealed in surveys across the United States. “At our hospital,” she explained, “it’s not a practice-builder for ENTs to take ER call. We see a lot of abscesses, bleeding, and facial trauma in our ER, but not your bread-and-butter sinus and ear cases. The types of cases we typically see are more conducive for training than for private practice.”

You Might Also Like

  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • Borrowing 101: Minimize risk when taking out a loan for your practice
Explore This Issue
June 2006

The affiliated hospital offered to pay Memorial Northwest Otolaryngology Medicaid reimbursement rates for uninsured patients seen in the ER. However, the hospital stipulated that patients would first have to apply for Medicaid. If coverage was denied, the hospital would reimburse the practice for the consultation. “But that would literally be four to six months after seeing the patient, and then it would be Medicaid rates,” Dr. Bowden pointed out. “We didn’t think that was worth it.”

‘Who wants to treat somebody who’s gotten nailed by a train? Because, frankly, you’re going to get paid more money if you work for the railway and you re-paint the train—without the liability.‘

Another disincentive was the higher liability risk of seeing patients in the ER, especially if they are uninsured, said Dr. Bowden. So far, Dr. Bowden has not seen any negative ramifications of taking herself off the on-call panel. She has privileges at five local hospitals, and still continues to do procedures at Memorial Hermann Northwest.

Inefficient at Best

Despite their removal from the hospital’s ER call panel, Dr. Bowden reports that she and her colleagues sometimes still get “roped into” taking ER call, as a primary care physician may admit an ER patient at the ER physician’s request and then call for an otolaryngology consult. “It’s a little better in that we aren’t required to leave our clinic to run over to the emergency room to stabilize patients,” she noted. But this practice can sometimes result in inappropriate hospital admissions, she said.

“As an emergency physician, I wish on some nights that taking call were a mandatory part of licensure for all specialists, but then, of course there would be other problems associated with that solution.” – Benjamin D. Vanlandingham, MD

Benjamin D. Vanlandingham, MD, Director of the Department of Emergency Medicine at St. Joseph Medical Center, a community hospital in Baltimore, Md., and a healthcare services researcher, has observed firsthand the inefficiencies of a fraying on-call coverage system. With no otolaryngologists on staff at St. Joseph Medical Center, Dr. Vanlandingham occasionally does require backup from an otolaryngologist. “Often, that backup could be care delivered in a delayed time frame, either in the office or at least with enough time to transfer to another hospital.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: cost, emergency, EMTALA, healthcare reform, insurance, legal, malpractice, Medicare, policy, reimbursementIssue: June 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • Borrowing 101: Minimize risk when taking out a loan for your practice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939