• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Stereotactic Radiation an Option for Acoustic Neuromas But Hearing Loss a Risk

by Heather Lindsey • May 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Age also influences whether a patient is a candidate for stereotactic radiation, said Dr. Coelho. This procedure offers an excellent alternative for elderly patients unable to tolerate surgery, he explained. However, younger patients may not want to pursue the stereotactic procedure because of the long-term potential of recurrence or developing radiation-induced malignancy.

You Might Also Like

  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treats Skull Base Tumors: Part 2 of
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Growing Opportunity for Otolaryngologists: Part 1 of 2
  • Hearing Loss: A Modifiable Risk Factor for Dementia
  • Pills vs. Injections: Which Steroids Are Best for Sudden Hearing Loss?
Explore This Issue
May 2008

We generally refer our young patients healthy patients to surgery because we don’t know the long-term effects of radiation, noted Dr. House. However, the procedure is indicated in older patients who have a documented growing tumor, he said.

Pre- and Post-Treatment

If stereotactic radiation is chosen, the physician needs to map the tumor with an MRI to determine treatment boundaries and the radiation dose, said Dr. House.

Patients should also receive an MRI six months after treatment to ensure that the tumor is not growing, said Dr. Bigelow. The tumor may initially show some swelling on this scan, so another MRI should be scheduled for six months later. Dr. Bigelow then sees patients once a year for an MRI and audiograms to monitor hearing.

Some tumors will start to grow again after five to 10 years, so ongoing follow-up is important, said Dr. House.

What Patients Should Know

Physicians need to provide complete disclosure of treatment options and their risks and benefits, said Dr. Coelho. Open and frequent dialogue between doctor and patient cannot be stressed enough, he said.

For example, patients should know that radiation does not cure acoustic neuromas but may prevent growth in about 80% of the tumors, said Dr. House. In contrast, at his facility, microsurgery has close to a 100% cure rate.

Some published data show higher control rates for stereotactic radiation. For example, in tumors no larger than 3 cm, control rates were 98% in a University of Pittsburgh study (N Eng J Med 1998;339:1426-33), noted Dr. Young.

When contemplating surgery, patients should remember that surgery carries the risk of infection, hemorrhage, and stroke if a blood vessel is injured, added Dr. Young. Moreover, with surgery, patients will spend three to five days in the hospital and three or four weeks recovering at home.

Surgery also has a high risk of hearing loss, depending on the size of the tumor, with smaller tumors posing less risk, said Dr. Bigelow. Patients and physicians should remember that significant risk of hearing loss exists with any treatment for acoustic neuroma.

If patients lose their hearing with surgery, this usually occurs on the day of the procedure, added Dr. Young.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, hearing loss, outcomes, patient communication, radiation, risk, surgery, treatment, tumorIssue: May 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treats Skull Base Tumors: Part 2 of
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Growing Opportunity for Otolaryngologists: Part 1 of 2
  • Hearing Loss: A Modifiable Risk Factor for Dementia
  • Pills vs. Injections: Which Steroids Are Best for Sudden Hearing Loss?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939