• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Growing Opportunity for Otolaryngologists: Part 1 of 2

by Alice Goodman • January 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Unlike the GammaKnife, which is used to treat lesions down to C1, the CyberKnife can be used to treat lesions involving head and neck, lung, kidney, and prostate, as well as all intracranial lesions with the exception of arterial-venous malformations. It can be used for trigeminal neuralgia but requires an invasive imaging study for planning purposes. The CyberKnife provides the ability to fractionate radiation doses and offers CT image-based planning, Dr. Daspit said. You can track the exact location of the patient for accuracy purposes during the treatment, he added.

You Might Also Like

  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treats Skull Base Tumors: Part 2 of
  • Stereotactic Radiation an Option for Acoustic Neuromas But Hearing Loss a Risk
  • Is Hearing Preserved Following Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma?
  • More Research Needed on Gamma Knife Surgery
Explore This Issue
January 2008
P. Ashley Wackym, MDIn order to be credentialed as a Gamma Knife surgeon, I would advise working closely with your hospital’s credentialing committee.
-P. Ashley Wackym, MD

Dr. Daspit had no financial ties to disclose regarding this device, and he noted that both the GammaKnife and CyberKnife are available at the Barrow Institute.

If a patient with preserved hearing wants radiosurgery, I strongly suggest using the CyberKnife, he stated.

Hearing loss is noted much more commonly with the GammaKnife; however, experience to date suggests that hearing is more likely to be preserved with the CyberKnife. Dr. Daspit said, It should be stressed that the data are quite ‘young’ and much longer follow-up is required to be able to state categorically that fractionation offers better hearing preservation as well as tumor control.

Overall experience at the University of Pittsburgh utilizing the GammaKnife has been reported to offer tumor control rates in the 90% to 95% range over 15 to 20 years. It is not known whether the CyberKnife results will be comparable, as the data reported from Stanford University are only 10 years old. Hearing preservation rates vary in the literature from 40% to 70%, depending on which series is quoted and which device is utilized. According to the literature, facial nerve injury is low with both platforms-in the <2% range, Dr. Daspit said.

Dr. Daspit pointed out and recommended strongly that all interested physicians obtain and read carefully the most recent practice guidelines published by the International Radiosurgery Association at www.irsa.org , he said.

At Barrow Neurological Institute, the trend favors use of the CyberKnife, because most patients present with serviceable hearing and most patients would rather try to preserve their hearing. Also, many points chose a frameless system. At this point in time, our hearing preservation rates are in the 70% range with the CyberKnife and 40% with the GammaKnife, Dr. Daspit said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Tech Talk Tagged With: cancer, CT, radiation, robotic surgery, surgery, techniques, technology, tumorsIssue: January 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treats Skull Base Tumors: Part 2 of
  • Stereotactic Radiation an Option for Acoustic Neuromas But Hearing Loss a Risk
  • Is Hearing Preserved Following Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma?
  • More Research Needed on Gamma Knife Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939