• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Telemedicine: Practicing Medicine across State Lines

by Steven M. Harris, Esq. • August 9, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

With the evolution and advancement of technology, it was only a matter of time before such changes affected the medical industry. Although the concept of telemedicine dates back more than 50 years, emphasis on cost-effective quality healthcare coupled with technological advancements has caused a resurgence of telemedicine in recent years.

You Might Also Like

  • Telemedicine: A Look at Recent Reforms Expanding Access, Use Amid Coronavirus Crisis
  • Using Telemedicine in Otolaryngology
  • Multi-State Licensure Plan for Physicians Nears Reality
  • Real-Time Telemedicine Model May Expand Otolaryngology Care to Remote Areas
Explore This Issue
August 2016

What constitutes telemedicine largely depends on who is answering the question. In addition, the terms telemedicine and telehealth are often used interchangeably. Telehealth has historically referred to a broad scope of remote healthcare services, whereas telemedicine refers to actual clinical practice via technology. This distinction is becoming less relevant as telemedicine expands. Currently, approximately three-quarters of states have some version of a telemedicine law. This number is constantly changing as more states adopt telemedicine laws, and those states with existing telemedicine laws amend their laws to expand or redefine what constitutes telemedicine, the permissible technology for providing telemedicine services and the requirements for a telemedicine encounter.

Certain undeniable benefits are associated with the expansion of telemedicine. However, when considering providing telemedicine services, legal issues must also be considered to ensure such services are offered in compliance with applicable law.

Telehealth has historically referred to a broad scope of remote healthcare services, whereas telemedicine refers to actual clinical practice via technology.

Benefits of Telemedicine

Although there are many benefits associated with telemedicine, the three most significant benefits include the following:

Access to healthcare: Since its inception, telemedicine has been used to provide access to healthcare services for patients located in rural areas. Telemedicine enables rural patients to easily obtain access to specialty services while remaining within their local community. In addition, telemedicine addresses healthcare shortages by allowing specialists to expand their reach beyond their office.

Improved patient outcomes: Studies have shown that telemedicine helps reduce readmissions and improve patient outcomes. This is due largely in part to the improved access to healthcare that telemedicine affords. Through the use of telemedicine, rural providers are able to easily consult with specialists. In addition, the use of technology allows for expedited transmission of laboratory and radiology images to other providers for second opinions. These factors combined have led to earlier diagnoses and treatment of patient conditions.

Reduced costs: The greatest impact of telemedicine is on the patient. Telemedicine services reduce travel time and related stresses for the patient, which in turn reduce patient costs. Telemedicine offers patients direct access to providers and specialists that might not be available without traveling long distances. Through telemedicine, specialists can team up with local healthcare providers to improve disease management and remotely monitor patients, which in turn reduces complications and readmissions, and thereby reduces overall costs to payers and patients.

Legal Issues

Several issues are associated with the provision of telemedicine services. The following is a discussion of four of the most critical issues that providers must address prior to offering telemedicine services.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Home Slider, Legal Matters Tagged With: technology, telehealth, telemedicineIssue: August 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Telemedicine: A Look at Recent Reforms Expanding Access, Use Amid Coronavirus Crisis
  • Using Telemedicine in Otolaryngology
  • Multi-State Licensure Plan for Physicians Nears Reality
  • Real-Time Telemedicine Model May Expand Otolaryngology Care to Remote Areas

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939