• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Telemedicine: Practicing Medicine across State Lines

by Steven M. Harris, Esq. • August 9, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Licensure: The definition of telemedicine varies by state and, therefore, so do the licensure requirements. Prior to the provision of telemedicine services, it’s critical that providers check applicable state laws to confirm that they are properly licensed to practice medicine where the patients are located. A few states require a separate telemedicine license, whereas others require the provider to be licensed where the patient is located. There are limited exceptions for consultations, but such exceptions typically apply only where the consultations provided are not routine or do not exceed a certain threshold number of consultations (often no more than 10 consultations annually).

You Might Also Like

  • Telemedicine: A Look at Recent Reforms Expanding Access, Use Amid Coronavirus Crisis
  • Using Telemedicine in Otolaryngology
  • Multi-State Licensure Plan for Physicians Nears Reality
  • Real-Time Telemedicine Model May Expand Otolaryngology Care to Remote Areas
Explore This Issue
August 2016

Consent, patient encounter, scope of services: Several states require that providers obtain the patient’s written consent prior to delivering telemedicine services, and a few others require verbal consent. Patient consent should be documented in the patient’s medical record. In addition, many states require that the provider satisfy certain elements in order to create a valid patient encounter. This can include an initial face-to-face visit. Finally, several states limit the type of services that may be provided via electronic means, as well as the permissible technology for providing telemedicine services. For these reasons, it’s imperative that applicable state law be reviewed to ensure compliance.

The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) drafted the Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Telemedicine Technologies in the Practice of Medicine. This model policy is intended to provide guidance to state medical boards when regulating the use of acceptable telemedicine technology. In addition, the model policy addresses licensure, establishment of the physician–patient relationship, informed consent, and privacy and security of patient medical records, among other topics. The intent of this policy is to ease the ability to practice telemedicine across state lines.

Reimbursement: Reimbursement continues to act as a barrier to telemedicine. Medicare offers limited reimbursement for such services and typically requires an initial face-to-face encounter between a patient and a provider, with certain exceptions for patients located within a healthcare professional shortage area. In addition, Medicare will generally reimburse only for face-to-face, interactive video consultation services that mimic in-person face-to-face interactions between patients and providers.

Because Medicaid is state specific, reimbursement for telemedicine services varies from state to state. There is also no applicable reimbursement standard for private payers. Less than half of states have enacted statutes that recognize or require reimbursement for telemedicine services by private payers. Some payers understand the value of telemedicine services and will reimburse for a wide range of telemedicine services, whereas others have yet to develop reimbursement policies and, therefore, payment for telemedicine services may require prior approval.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Home Slider, Legal Matters Tagged With: technology, telehealth, telemedicineIssue: August 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Telemedicine: A Look at Recent Reforms Expanding Access, Use Amid Coronavirus Crisis
  • Using Telemedicine in Otolaryngology
  • Multi-State Licensure Plan for Physicians Nears Reality
  • Real-Time Telemedicine Model May Expand Otolaryngology Care to Remote Areas

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939