• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Evolution of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

by David W. Kennedy, MD • February 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

We now know that it is unwise to open up virgin mucosa to the same environmental factors that caused the inflammation to develop in the first place, unless those environmental factors have been removed or their effects medically controlled. Additionally, we have demonstrated conclusively that improvement in symptoms does not correlate with resolution of disease and that the latter typically requires prolonged medical therapy and careful endoscopic follow up. Indeed, it appears that in many cases surgery alone does not create a long-term resolution, and prolonged medical therapy is typically required for control of this chronic disorder.

You Might Also Like

  • Sleep Improves after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With or Without OSA
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Improves QoL in Patients with Minimal Disease
  • Drugs, Surgery, Endoscopic Sinus Surgery As Remedies for Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Factors Associated with Increased Opioid Use in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Explore This Issue
February 2007

Current Advances

Whereas, 20 years ago, the surgery itself was limited, quick, and frequently involved some stripping of mucosa from the ethmoid sinuses, it is now a much more meticulous procedure, with the surgeon taking care to preserve the mucoperiosteum and to avoid exposed bone. At the same time, significantly greater attention is given to completely removing the bony partitions in the areas of disease, because we now believe that this inflamed bone may lead to persistent inflammation and scarring. This surgical evolution has been aided by the development of through-cutting forceps and the microdebrider. As microdebrider technology has improved, so has the potential to remove disease rapidly with excellent mucoperiosteal preservation. However, with the use of powered instrumentation, there has also some suggestion that the degree of severity of complications may have again risen, because of the potential for microdebriders to rapidly remove either orbital contents or brain should the surgeon stray out of the normal surgical field.

A number of other technological advancements have had a significant impact on our ability to improve endoscopic sinus surgery. The ability of the Endoscrub™ to maintain clear visualization in the presence of bleeding, improved charge-coupled device (CCD) camera technology, and the development of suction irrigation drills have all enhanced our ability to completely remove disease and to extend the surgery beyond just the treatment of rhinosinusitis and beyond the boundaries of the nose. Although there is very limited evidence to suggest that the use of computer-assisted surgical navigation reduces complications, it clearly improves the surgeon’s ability to perform a complete surgical procedure and is a superb teaching tool. However, perhaps most important, scrolling through the images in a triplanar display preoperatively enables the surgeon to gain 3-D conceptualization of the anatomy, which is difficult to achieve with static images, even when they are available for review in all three planes. A significant limitation of computer-assisted surgical navigation, however, is its reliance on the preoperative scans. An exciting new development in this field is the introduction of portable low-radiation-dosage intraoperative CT with the ability to update the information in the image-guidance computer with real-time intraoperative images. Our preliminary work with such intraoperative CT scans suggests that they will be of significant benefit in ensuring the completeness of surgery.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Columns Issue: February 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Sleep Improves after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With or Without OSA
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Improves QoL in Patients with Minimal Disease
  • Drugs, Surgery, Endoscopic Sinus Surgery As Remedies for Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Factors Associated with Increased Opioid Use in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939